Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
Closing this PR. About to open another one with the fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
I think you closed the wrong one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
I was not happy with #381 . I will reopen it soon once I have a fix that I
am happy with.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
Probably a dumb question, but doesn't integration-test run Failsafe?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
@JonZeolla - oh yeah, totally in agreement there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
@dlyle65535 while we slightly disagree on semantics, I agree that this
should move forward for the short term. I'm primarily indicating that the dev
guide needs updated to account for
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
Doesn't this conflict with the merge requirements on the draft [Coding
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
page? Specifically:
* A
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
Agreed, this should be changed in the pom.
http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/inclusion-exclusion.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
Configuration only change. So, let's say that there is another pr that
changes that test, it can do so without worrying about the commented out code
etc. not a big deal, really
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
Dunno. What are the advantages to doing it that way?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380
can this be done in the pom/surefire?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
11 matches
Mail list logo
