Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
We should ask @dlyle65535 whether he completely obsoleted this one. In the
meantime, METRON-634 PR#532 is definitely needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
@mattf-horton Still needed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
@dlyle65535 , please see https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
@dlyle65535 , I'll be happy to share my wip. It will take me a few hours
to brush it off, then I'll post it as a PR referring to
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
@mattf-horton - I need an MPack that works for 1-N nodes in order to
complete [METRON-671](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-671). I
suspect I'm working through stuff you've
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
@JonZeolla , I removed the obsolete comments about MySQL installation in
Mpack. Thanks for the suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
Hi @dlyle65535 , from a design perspective, I totally agree that we should
have a single MPack that works on any size cluster, and I hope to replace both
the 4(+)-node and single-node
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
This is great stuff. Can you talk a bit about why you split it off instead
of just updated the existing MPack to support 1+ nodes? I'd prefer not to
maintain two if we don't have to.
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
Is "MySQL should not be installed on a node already running a MySQL
instance" still accurate wrt Ambari MPack? I thought this was fixed. I see it
noted as the 2nd bullet point
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
Oops, now the 2017 fix (METRON-647) is committed. Kicking Travis again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
kicking travis
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/408
Please note the Travis failures are not relevant. All nine are due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-648
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
12 matches
Mail list logo
