Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/472
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user kylerichardson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/472
Thanks! Next time the storm Dockerfile needs a tweak, I'll rework it to use
the packages approach too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
I'm game for that
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017, 1:19 PM Matt Foley wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
>
>
> From: Otto Fowler
> Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 10:13 AM
> To: "dev@metron.incubator.apache.org" ,
> Matt Foley
Makes sense.
From: Otto Fowler
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 10:13 AM
To: "dev@metron.incubator.apache.org" , Matt
Foley
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Maven Plugin to build packages with
dependencies
I am
I am going to proceed on with 2.
It is prudent to stand review and criticism before involving infrastructure.
On March 28, 2017 at 13:00:46, Matt Foley (ma...@apache.org) wrote:
I support option 1 if Infra will do it. Otherwise 2. But it might be easier
to achieve the Infra request after we
I support option 1 if Infra will do it. Otherwise 2. But it might be easier
to achieve the Infra request after we have exited the incubator.
--Matt
On 3/27/17, 6:25 PM, "zeo...@gmail.com" wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion here, but I'm interested to see what the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/494
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/494
Ok - removed from child poms, put in parent
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/494
Since all assemblies require this, would it make sense to configure it in
pluginManagement in the top level POM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user ottobackwards opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/494
METRON-806 set posix for metron-rest
## Contributor Comments
Any new assemblies added to the project need to have the tarLongFileMode set
Tested by running on a
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/472
Looks good. I like the packages approach instead of listing out individual
modules. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/491
Ran it several times. Looks good. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
12 matches
Mail list logo