On 2018/03/08 05:20:41, "Go Yamamoto" <yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: 
> Hi
> 
> Who is taking care of management tasks right now?
> We would like to request the official repository to release our code.
> If nobody is working for the task, we will take it over.

Who is "we" in this case?
http://git.apache.org/ shows 11 repositories for Milagro.

> 
> Regards,
> Go Yamamoto
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikolai Stoilov [mailto:nikolai.stoi...@miracl.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:51 AM
> To: dev@milagro.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> 
> Hi Go,
> 
> Regarding management, I can show someone from your side how to fill in the 
> monthly reports which are required for the project.
> 
> Nikolai
> 
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:24 PM Giorgio Zoppi <giorgio.zo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Ok,
> > just to be proactive, schedule some tickets when you have a plan and i 
> > will able to do a couple of jiras at week,
> >
> > 2018-02-19 17:15 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp>:
> >
> > > Thanks, Giorgio.
> > >
> > > All, let's start planning release the crypto library first.
> > > I think we can simply start official repository that mirrors current 
> > > crypto code at Miracl's, and then we declare that it is the master 
> > > of the project.
> > > After that, Miracl's team will pull-request to contribute the
> > advancements
> > > at the local repo.
> > >
> > > We can start right now.
> > > Who is managing the official repo right now?
> > >
> > > Go
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:giorgio.zo...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:00 AM
> > > To: dev@milagro.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > >
> > > If it goes as planner i canhelp and build and test code. Porting 
> > > some
> > code
> > > to c++ for the server part.
> > >
> > > 2018-02-19 16:53 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp>:
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > We again request to discuss renewing the roadmap and to start the 
> > > > official repository to share the codes we have worked for years.
> > > > Kelean, what do you think is blocking this obvious task?
> > > >
> > > > If this project needs help in management, we are willing to
> > participate.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Go Yamamto
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Go Yamamoto [mailto:yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 1:24 PM
> > > > To: 'dev@milagro.incubator.apache.org'
> > > > <dev@milagro.incubator.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > >
> > > > Simeon, please tell us whatever you need.
> > > > I think it is obvious that the leadership team is responsible to 
> > > > present a roadmap.
> > > > I will be always willing to participate or to help.
> > > >
> > > > Go
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:giorgio.zo...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 8:01 PM
> > > > To: dev@milagro.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > >
> > > > If there is a clear roadmap. You can decide to assign some tickets 
> > > > to me and i will help.
> > > >
> > > > 2018-02-07 10:13 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <simeon.alad...@miracl.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for being out of pocket for a while and not being able to 
> > > > > participate in the discussion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Re the repositories reorganization - it hasn't been really clear 
> > > > > how this needs to be done from a procedural stand point.
> > > > > None of the contributors have the permissions to manipulate the 
> > > > > project repositories, and AFAIK, only the project mentors can do 
> > > > > that, but what needs to be done in order for this to happen, 
> > > > > hasn't
> > > been clear.
> > > > > This was one of our pain points along the way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Re the roadmap - as I already mentioned, MIRACL didn't have 
> > > > > resources to lead the project, but the question is - in a 
> > > > > community like this, who is responsible to craft a roadmap?
> > > > > The discussed direction is to focus the project on the crypto 
> > > > > library, with which MIRACL and NTT agree, and I guess if/when 
> > > > > NTT take the leading role on the project, they can propose a roadmap.
> > > > >
> > > > > We also have a more developed version of the crypto, with full 
> > > > > unit-test coverage, which we can merge to the project when we 
> > > > > figure-out the repositories issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > Simeon Aladjem
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/2/18, 6:49, "Go Yamamoto" <yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     We have been talking with Simeon and Kealan about the roadmap.
> > > > >     We think it will make sense if we release the crypto library 
> > > > > first, and then the authentication server/clients second.  What 
> > > > > do we need to authorize the plan?
> > > > >
> > > > >     So far the code in the library looks mature and we have 
> > > > > found no problems in actual use in our engineering activities.
> > > > >     It could be better to work for test codes more before the 
> > > > > crypto library released since the current code does not seem to 
> > > > > cover sub-normal cases necessarily.
> > > > >     It does not mean I think the improvements on test codes are 
> > > > > required for the first release, they will at least help further 
> > > > > development activities.
> > > > >
> > > > >     BTW, our repository contains a lot of possible contributions 
> > > > > on test codes.
> > > > >     I believe the code will help users and developers if they 
> > > > > are
> > > merged.
> > > > >
> > > > >     Regards,
> > > > >     Go Yamamoto
> > > > >
> > > > >     -----Original Message-----
> > > > >     From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:giorgio.zo...@gmail.com]
> > > > >     Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:29 AM
> > > > >     To: dev@milagro.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >     Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > >
> > > > >     BTW,
> > > > >     do you have a roadmap? Do you want to support hardware as well?
> > > > > IS there  a todo list of things? When do you plan next release?
> > > > >
> > > > >     2018-01-30 22:26 GMT+01:00 Giorgio Zoppi <
> > giorgio.zo...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > >     > Hello everybody,
> > > > >     > is there any way to save just the crypto library inside Apache?
> > > The
> > > > >     > server  doenst make sense, there is no valuable code.
> > > > >     > The crypto library including mpin protocol can be used 
> > > > > from
> > other
> > > > >     > projects. Currently there is no community.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > 2018-01-30 22:12 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >> Simeon,
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >> In order for that to happen, someone would need to make 
> > > > > sure
> > Go
> > > > >     >> Yamamoto has write access to the repositories.  I'm not 
> > > > > sure that has happened.
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >> John
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >> On 2018/01/30 14:49:07, Simeon Aladjem 
> > > > > <simeon.alad...@miracl.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >     >> > Hi all,
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > As a part of MIRACL, I feel that I have to provide our
> > > > perspective
> > > > >     >> > on
> > > > >     >> the project.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > First of all, we did disengage with the idea to move 
> > > > > the
> > > Milagro
> > > > >     >> > Crypto
> > > > >     >> code elsewhere.
> > > > >     >> > All the code under the Milagro project refers to the crypto
> > > > >     >> > repository
> > > > >     >> that is under Apache, so 
> > > > > https://github.com/milagro-crypto
> > > > doesn't
> > > > >     >> directly affect the project at the current.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > It does contain a more developed version of the 
> > > > > original
> > > Milagro
> > > > >     >> > Crypto
> > > > >     >> code, which will eventually find its way to the project,
> > > > >     >> > but in order for this to happen we will need some repository
> > > > >     >> reorganization, which was communicated in the past, to 
> > > > > the best of my
> > > > >     >> memory.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > MIRACL is committed to continue and contribute to the
> > Milagro
> > > > >     >> > Crypto
> > > > >     >> code, but we were unable to play the leading role in the 
> > > > > project
> > > > for
> > > > >     >> the last year or so.
> > > > >     >> > For this reason, it was proposed that NTT and Go 
> > > > > Yamamoto will take
> > > > >     >> > on
> > > > >     >> the leadership over the project going forward.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > I hope that it clarifies some points, and will help on 
> > > > > getting
> > > > the
> > > > >     >> project out of the mud and to start moving it forward.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > Kind Regards,
> > > > >     >> > Simeon Aladjem
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> > On 30/1/18, 15:54, "John D.Ament" 
> > > > > <johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> >     Hi Yamamoto
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> >     I believe you're hitting the problem right on the head.
> > > The
> > > > >     >> project was originally founded with a donation from MIRACL.
> > > > > You
> > > > can
> > > > >     >> see that code changes continually go to
> > > > >     >> https://github.com/milagro-crypto but no changes to 
> > > > > Apache hosted git repositories.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> >     I understand your frustration, but the implications I am
> > > > > seeing
> > > > >     >> > are
> > > > >     >> that MIRACL has no interest in working on code within the
> > > podling.
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> >     John
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> >     On 2018/01/30 05:17:42, "Go Yamamoto"
> > > > >     >> > <yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > > > >     >> wrote:
> > > > >     >> >     > Hi John,
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > NTT is currently using Milagro as a crypto library.
> > > > >     >> > Retirement
> > > > >     >> of Milagro causes impact on our business, so I would like 
> > > > > to ask
> > > > for
> > > > >     >> discussion what can we do for supporting Milagro.
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > As I mentioned last time, we have code that is ready
> > to
> > > > > commit.
> > > > >     >> >     > Our repositories have been updated since then.
> > > > >     >> >     > However, the way to commit the code to Apache
> > repository
> > > > is
> > > > >     >> > not
> > > > >     >> clear for us.
> > > > >     >> >     > As far as I recognize it is because the code from
> > MIRACL
> > > > is
> > > > >     >> > not
> > > > >     >> placed on the Apache repository.
> > > > >     >> >     > Since MIRACL's code also have been updated
> > continuously,
> > > > it
> > > > >     >> > seems
> > > > >     >> this management problem blocks starting the project for years.
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > I think we can discuss whether NTT team can take over
> > > the
> > > > >     >> management of the Apache repository to resolve the problem.
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > Kind regards,
> > > > >     >> >     > Go Yamamoto
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >     >> >     > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> > > > >     >> >     > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:06 PM
> > > > >     >> >     > To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> > > > >     >> >     > Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > Hi All,
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > Mid last year [1] I reached out to the project about
> > > > > retirement.
> > > > >     >> At that point, some community members stepped up to help 
> > > > > out the project.
> > > > >     >> However, I don't believe its been enough.
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > Since that has occurred:
> > > > >     >> >     > - Milagro has missed reporting periods.  This has
> > > included
> > > > >     >> multiple requests for a report by me.
> > > > >     >> >     > - Requests for a special report clarifying the move of
> > > > > source
> > > > >     >> code away from the ASF managed repos on github have been
> > > > unanswered.
> > > > >     >> >     > - On list activity has dropped to nearly nothing.
> > > > >     >> >     > - Very little commit activity; most of your
> > repositories
> > > > > have
> > > > >     >> > not
> > > > >     >> been updated since we last spoke.
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > At this point, I believe its clear that Milagro should
> > > > > retire.
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     > [1]:
> > > > >     >> >     > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > > > e6a5db6fab6c61156c2101a
> > > > >     >> 
> > > > > ae003ed576ddb0e77f3bb2c037b405131@%3Cdev.milagro.apache.org
> > %3E
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >> >
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Nikolai Stoilov
> NOC/Support Team Lead
> MIRACL
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to