On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Coding Horse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why didn't I have this problem before using mina? I used nio directly
and never called setReuseAddres(). The server was in the same linux box
before using mina.
Why don't you trace the
Here's one possible use case: I have just one processor thread and no thread
pool. I want to unbind from within an IoHandler method (messageReceived,
sessionIdle, etc), but currently we wait for the unbind to finish. Doesn't
this automatically create a deadlock? I.e., waiting for an unbind in the
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vinod,
On 4/5/07, Vinod Panicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Coding Horse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why didn't I have this problem before using mina? I used nio directly
On 4/5/07, Greg Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I am queuing write requests as well, but the way you mentioned seems
like a possible ticket to OutOfMemoryError.
Yep, but user wrote by one's own will. ;)
And on the read operation, we can't remove OP_READ on DatagramAcceptor,
because there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee reopened DIRMINA-342:
-
Assignee: Trustin Lee
TCP service not shutting down cleanly
Great! Yes, I will take this on, and I will also see about getting the
change into SocketAcceptor. I'll let you know if I need any help.
Thanks
-Greg
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Greg Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one possible use case: I have just one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-366.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done. I made sure reuseAddress and sendBufferSize is configured properly.
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, but user wrote by one's own will. ;)
True ... I guess it doesn't make sense to encourage all of the overhead of
writing a message if we just drop it on the floor. Maybe I can add some
clarity to the documentation for this, though.
I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-342.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.2)
1.0.3
DIRMINA-366
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X]: +1, release
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Hi folks,
Sorry to bother you by firing two votes at once, but I must admit that
MINA 1.1.0, Java 5 port of MINA 1.0.x is ready to be released IMHO.
Java 5 Generics and covariant return type have been used extensively
so there's no more cumbersome down-casts. Except that it doesn't have
any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-365.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M1
Done.
Make use of covariant return types
Hi Vinod,
On 4/5/07, Vinod Panicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Coding Horse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why didn't I have this problem before using mina? I used nio directly
and never called setReuseAddres(). The server was in
Hi community,
We have fixed 7 bugs since we released MINA 1.0.2. I was actually
shocked that there were so many unexpected bugs. Thank you all
community members for reporting bugs that the committers couldn't
find!
The following URL shows the list of the fixed bugs:
http://tinyurl.com/ytbq2f
[X]: +1, release
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Thanks !
My use case is to provide a framework to make a replacement of Rmi for
internal use in entreprise (RAD) without the f... problems of registry
SecurityManager and codebase and Remote interface , based on Mina (very
fun framework you've done !)
I will try to improve my framework
Hi
I have prototype for latency measurements, in which I have a blocking stream
based client and server based on MINA. When client sends handshake data,
which is really a java object, I get a Byte buffer on the server but I don’t
how to extract a java object from that byte buffer. I tried using
[x]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
I've been waiting :)
Hi thanks for your answer, but I 've tried to set the tcpNoDelay to false on
each side and I didn't saw any really performance improvment.
The first problem is that if I test by only sending message but not waiting
for response, mina take 0.12 ms per call, aigainst Rmi that take 0.16 ms per
call
***
Click here to view our e-mail legal notice:
http://www.mxit.co.za/pdfs/mxit_legal.pdf or call: +27 21 888 7000
***
[x]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X]: +1, release
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
On 4/5/07, yann Blazart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for your answer, but I 've tried to set the tcpNoDelay to false on
each side and I didn't saw any really performance improvment.
The first problem is that if I test by only sending message but not waiting
for response, mina take 0.12 ms
Hi Yogs,
On 4/5/07, Yogs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have prototype for latency measurements, in which I have a blocking stream
based client and server based on MINA. When client sends handshake data,
which is really a java object, I get a Byte buffer on the server but I don't
how to
***
Click here to view our e-mail legal notice:
http://www.mxit.co.za/pdfs/mxit_legal.pdf or call: +27 21 888 7000
***
[x]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't
[X]: +1, release
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
[x]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
On 4/5/07, yann Blazart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks !
My use case is to provide a framework to make a replacement of Rmi for
internal use in entreprise (RAD) without the f... problems of registry
SecurityManager and codebase and Remote interface , based on Mina
(very
fun framework
Great job! Trustin.
I just updated mina trunk and tried
acceptor.getSessionConfig().setReuseAddress(true);
and it works like magic in the production server!
Sorry about not providing enough problem trace when I reported the issue on
my server - the major reason among others is that the water
[X]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
[x]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Hanson
[x]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Hanson
Thank you, Trustin.
Looking forward to its release.
Cheers,
Dong
On 4/4/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dong,
On 4/3/07, Dong Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, AsyncWeb is merging with Mina. So when will similar
APIs available?
AsyncWeb is going to be our
I've done some simple tests and the IO subsystem (BIO vs NIO) makes little
difference on a servers performance (when properly configured). For example, I
built a quick client and server to test NIO vs BIO performance. It
was a simple echo server, only had 1 thread and the messages were
small,
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[ X ]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Enrique
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[ X ]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Enrique
+1
On 4/5/07, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[ X ]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Enrique
+1
On 4/5/07, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[ X ]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Enrique
+1
Alex
On 4/5/07, Rodrigo Madera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 4/5/07, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[ X ]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
Enrique
38 matches
Mail list logo
