On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Mike Heath wrote:
Sangjin Lee wrote:
What I've seen with AHC is that the configuration is often the most
challenging aspect. One metaphor I used is that HttpClient is
more like a
I noticed this too... Incidentally I also noticed that the SSL unit tests
were broken due to the way that the SSL filter is added but that seems to be
an old issue. The SSL filter should be added before the protocol codec
filter...
Shall I file a bug and submit a patch for both?
Thanks,
Sangjin
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I noticed this too... Incidentally I also noticed that the SSL unit tests
were broken due to the way that the SSL filter is added but that seems to be
an old issue. The SSL filter should be added before the protocol codec
filter...
Shall I file a bug and submit a patch
Not yet... I haven't got an account setup confirmation from ASF...
Regards,
Sangjin
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I noticed this too... Incidentally I also noticed that the SSL unit
tests
were broken due to the way that the
I haven't had a chance to add my use case: the scatter-and-gather
situation where one uses a completion queue to handle the result. Hopefully
I'll do that some time this week...
I also would like to discuss how to get back to the request while processing
the response. It is often desirable and
We have been making a number of changes on the Geronimo sandbox side for the
AsyncHttpClient. We've been meaning to move them over, but the pent-up
changes have grown to quite a few. I haven't had time to sit down and
analyze whether certain bug fixes are applicable for the asyncweb codec. I
I think Trustin sent the request. Sometimes a bunch of them get processed
on Wednesdays by Joes. So it's got to be in the queue. If not we can has
him on infra what the status is.
Alex
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm...that is something that
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hmmm...that is something that should not take long...
We need to get this handled ASAP. Alex...any thoughts?
This usually take a week, sometime more.
The account creation request has been sent on feb, 25th.
Be patient ;)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel
Alex Karasulu wrote:
I think Trustin sent the request.
He did, on feb, 25th...
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
We have been making a number of changes on the Geronimo sandbox side
for the
AsyncHttpClient. We've been meaning to move them over, but the pent-
up
changes have grown to quite a few. I haven't had time to sit down and
analyze whether
asyncweb build is broken
Key: ASYNCWEB-5
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-5
Project: Asyncweb
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Sangjin Lee
Priority: Blocker
The asyncweb build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated ASYNCWEB-5:
---
Attachment: ASYNCWEB-5.patch
A suggested fix...
asyncweb build is broken
Hello,
does anyone have an example of how to use a ReadThrottleFilter to prevent OOM
errors.
Thanks
_
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
AsyncHttpClient was changed w/ the last checkin on 2/26 and now the
build is broken.
I looked at the actual changes. I'm just trying to grok the changes
because I realize that I am new here. It seems that the old
AsyncHttpClient is
14 matches
Mail list logo
