[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved ASYNCWEB-5.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 633433.
Thanks Sangjin.
asyncweb build is broken
I agree with Alan...I understood that the G version was going away now
that we built community over here on this. Comments?
Jeff
Alan Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
AsyncHttpClient was changed w/ the last checkin on 2/26 and now the
build is broken.
I am in agreement as well. I would like to see this merge happen quickly so
the users see progress and there's no longer any need to keep the G branch
alive. Someone said to me you need to get cookin in the kitchen when the
guests arrive :). Then we can just start releasing some milestones that
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
I haven't had a chance to add my use case: the scatter-and-gather
situation where one uses a completion queue to handle the result.
Hopefully
I'll do that some time this week...
I also would like to discuss how to get back to the request
If I want to have a program that received UDP packets. Do I need to
write a protocol filter in order to make sure my
IoHandler.messageReceived() method only gets one packet at a time?
Thanks
First off, sorry for the LATE response tot his thread. My comments are
below inline.
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Adding commit(Partial)?Response method causes HttpResponse to keep a
response to IoSession, which doesn't sound good to me. What do you
think about providing another setContent
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
We have been making a number of changes on the Geronimo sandbox side
for the
AsyncHttpClient. We've been meaning to move them over, but the pent-up
changes have grown to quite a few. I haven't had time to sit down
HttpMethod should not be an enum
Key: ASYNCWEB-6
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-6
Project: Asyncweb
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mike Heath
Currently o.a.a.common.HttpMethod
I would also like to see asyncweb make progress as quickly as possible, and
I'd like to contribute to that effect as well. As Mike pointed out in a
different thread, however, there are some challenges to this. It's looking
more likely that this is not going to be a simple merge of code but
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I would also like to see asyncweb make progress as quickly as possible, and
I'd like to contribute to that effect as well. As Mike pointed out in a
different thread, however, there are some challenges to this. It's looking
more likely that this is not going to be a simple
10 matches
Mail list logo