On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 1:50 PM, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 3, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Now, the question is why do we allow a user to define it's own
ExceptionMonitor to handle unhandled exceptions. As we are defining a
framework, it does not make a lot of
Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 1:50 PM, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 3, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Now, the question is why do we allow a user to define it's own
ExceptionMonitor to handle unhandled exceptions. As we are defining a
On Jul 5, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
- as it's a framework, I think that exceptions, if they are to be
caught, should be caught at the upper level, not down in the code. Why
the hell do we have to define a generic monitor which does nothing
more than logging a warning ?
I don't
peter royal wrote:
On Jul 5, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
- as it's a framework, I think that exceptions, if they are to be
caught, should be caught at the upper level, not down in the code. Why
the hell do we have to define a generic monitor which does nothing
more than logging a
Downloaded file signatures are incorrect
Key: DIRMINA-606
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-606
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.1.7, 1.0.10, 2.0.0-M1
