Full Javadocs for the public API
Key: FTPSERVER-212
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-212
Project: FtpServer
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core, Ftplets
Affects
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:40:09 +0100
Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
while thinking about the best possible implementation for the new
chain, I had a look at the ExecutorFilter which is quite an
interesting filter, wrt the way we handle the chain.
Remember that a
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
while thinking about the best possible implementation for the new chain, I
had a look at the ExecutorFilter which is quite an interesting filter, wrt
the way we handle the chain.
Remember that a session may
Hi,
There is something in MINA who has hook everywhere in the core, it's
traffic mask. As far I understand the concept, the idea is to be able
to block read and/or writes using session.setTrafficMask(...), I never
needed it, and I wonder who use it and for what exactly ?
Julien
signature.asc
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Hello,
Hi Maarten (eh eh, I typed it correctly this time !),
I also use messageSent but I guess I can also replace it with an
IoFutureListener.
What do you mean when you say that SESSION_IDLE is questionable ?
What would you replace it with ?
There is a thread
Wasn't it an attempt to implement throttling ?
When requests are coming in faster than they're being processed
= set TrafficMask to block reading
= TCP buffers will fill up (OS level)
= TCP will tell sender to slow down
= OOM prevented
when queue of incoming messages gets smaller = resume
Ashish wrote:
2) Where in the chain do you put this filter ?
Multiple places to implement SEDA (before ProtocolDecoder, before IoHandler)
I would like to know if you are not ask risk to have a hell lot of
thread if you do so. And I'm not sure that it has any added value, as
the
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Wasn't it an attempt to implement throttling ?
I have no idea. The documentation is pretty scarse, it's not used
anywhere but as a parameter passed from method to method, the event
type is never used to create an event ...
When requests are coming in faster than
It was used by Read/WriteThrottlingFilter wich was removed of 2.0 :
http://www.nabble.com/Dropping-traffic-throttling-from-2.0-td16092085.html
as said by Emm look like it's used nowhere is MINA codebase.
As said by Trustin in this mail the remplacement is supposed to be
o.a.m.f.executor.* and no
Can't make ApacheCon this week in New Orleans? You can still watch all
the keynotes, Apache 101 sessions, and system administration track in
live video streams:
http://streaming.linux-magazin.de/en/program_apacheconus08.htm?ann
Keynotes and the Apache 101 lunchtime sessions are free; the
Hi,
I have a question regarding the way this event is handled in MINA. When
you connect to a remote server, the client will call the
NioSocketConnector, which will create a connection, then a Processor
will be spawn, its add() method will be called, the session will be
initialized (the chain
While using mina, I didn't know where to call session.close() after I write
the message to the session.
Shall I just set the idletime and leave the session close itself?
Mark internal classes as internal
-
Key: FTPSERVER-213
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-213
Project: FtpServer
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core
Affects Versions:
Hi Erix,
You can do like this:
ioSession.write(someMessage).addListener(IoFutureListener.CLOSE);
Bogdan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Erix Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While using mina, I didn't know where to call session.close() after I write
the message to the session.
Shall I just set
Hi guys,
while thinking about the best possible implementation for the new chain,
I had a look at the ExecutorFilter which is quite an interesting filter,
wrt the way we handle the chain.
Remember that a session may handle more than one event at the same time,
especially when using the
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:49:48 +0100
Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think we should focus on getting 2.0 out the door. We have been
working on it long enough and I think there are
Hi All,
I'm not a direct Mina user but rather someone who integrates with
ApacheDS, and had to delve deep into the Mina 1.x code to fix a bug.
Hence my opinions, for what they are worth, are those of an outsider
who expects to be able to debug pretty much any code when I have a)
the source and b)
17 matches
Mail list logo