On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Bernd
Fondermannbernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, MUC is definitively effected.
I'm not talking about the MUC code receiving a presence stanza from a client.
(BTW, your use of messages is ambivalent. do you mean 'message
stanza' or 'stanza' in
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 08:48, Niklas Gustavssonnik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Bernd
Fondermannbernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, MUC is definitively effected.
I'm not talking about the MUC code receiving a presence stanza from a client.
(BTW, your use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12743985#action_12743985
]
Bernd Fondermann commented on VYSPER-175:
-
what would collision mean in this
Hi Niklas,
MUCIntegrationTestCase.java doesn't compile for me.
The class seems to be incomplete.
Bernd
n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ngn
Date: Mon Aug 17 06:46:37 2009
New Revision: 804875
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=804875view=rev
Log:
Adding integration test case for MUC
I'm might be a bit slow here, so have patience :-)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Bernd
Fondermannbernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
It's only that the server in general (with or without MUC doesn't
matter) doesn't currently handle directed presence stanzas from the
client.
Think of it
There are a number of issues fixed in sshd (see [1]) so I'm planning to do a
0.2.0 release this week ...
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:26, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a number of issues fixed in sshd (see [1]) so I'm planning to do
a 0.2.0 release this week ...
--
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Bernd
Fondermannbernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:55, Niklas Gustavssonnik...@protocol7.com wrote:
I'm might be a bit slow here, so have patience :-)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Bernd
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Guillaume Nodetgno...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a number of issues fixed in sshd (see [1]) so I'm planning to do a
0.2.0 release this week ...
Sounds good!
/niklas
Le Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:26:30 +0200,
Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com a écrit :
There are a number of issues fixed in sshd (see [1]) so I'm planning
to do a 0.2.0 release this week ...
+1 :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bernd Fondermannbf_...@brainlounge.de wrote:
In the federated case where a jabber.org user logs in to
chat.vysper.org this would still work with the current code.
There is no way for a jabber.org user to log into vysper.org in XMPP.
He can only log into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Vermillard reassigned DIRMINA-719:
-
Assignee: Julien Vermillard
Serial Filter Chain Broken For Outbound Data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Vermillard reassigned DIRMINA-720:
-
Assignee: Julien Vermillard
Hardware Flow Control Disables Serial Port on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744050#action_12744050
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-719:
---
I committed a possible fix
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bernd Fondermannbf_...@brainlounge.de
wrote:
In the federated case where a jabber.org user logs in to
chat.vysper.org this would still work with the current code.
There is no way for a jabber.org user to log into vysper.org in XMPP.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Bernd Fondermannbf_...@brainlounge.de wrote:
I still don't understand how StanzaHandlerLookup would be able to
understand that this should not go to PresenceHandler again. Or maybe
we need to change StanzaHandlerLookup to be able to distinguish
between outbound
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
There is a problem with the fairness against writes no ?
You can perhaps saturate the IoP with reading ?
yes, probably, but I think it would be better then to use a
configuration parameter to ensure the fairness, like the maximum size we
can read before
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Bernd Fondermannbf_...@brainlounge.de
wrote:
I still don't understand how StanzaHandlerLookup would be able to
understand that this should not go to PresenceHandler again. Or maybe
we need to change StanzaHandlerLookup to be able to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Bernd Fondermannbf_...@brainlounge.de wrote:
Would you have the time to look into implementing this? I don't think
I got sufficient knowledge of the Vysper internals to get this right.
Great. I'll first have to complete the GSoC stuff, but then I'll get to
it.
Hi Michael,
At first: Congratulations for successfully completing your GSoC09
project on time! It's been a pleasure for me to see you working on PubSub.
I hope we see you working on Vysper in future.
Now the demo.
Yesterday I got it working.
I removed the call to
20 matches
Mail list logo
