On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm going to remove the MINA 2 wiki space, it's totally useless now that we
have moved back all the pages it contains to the main MINA space.
+1, go for it :)
I'm also updating the User guide, making it
Hi!
I'm sceptical about it. Maybe you could design it in a way, that the
IoProcessor is replaceable, so one could test the behaviour.
Cons:
* Imagine a bunch of smaller write requests per session. Currently an
IoProcessor at least have a chance to optimize the writes by flushing all data
of
On 4/18/11 10:01 AM, Steve Ulrich wrote:
Hi!
I'm sceptical about it. Maybe you could design it in a way, that the
IoProcessor is replaceable, so one could test the behaviour.
And this is why I posted my suggestion on the mailing list :) My idea
might well be totally off base.
Cons:
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13020955#comment-13020955
]
Christian Schwarz commented on DIRMINA-653:
---
Yes, the BufferDataException is
D4n Outlook. This time with a better quotation... I hope
Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecha...@gmail.com] wrote
Fair enough. But we can mitigate this risk on the IoProcessor too, by
pulling out of the queue all the messages for a session, until the
socket can't accept any more writing.
Le Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:26:42 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 4/18/11 10:01 AM, Steve Ulrich wrote:
Hi!
I'm sceptical about it. Maybe you could design it in a way, that
the IoProcessor is replaceable, so one could test the behaviour.
And this is why I posted my
On 4/18/11 12:13 PM, Steve Ulrich wrote:
D4n Outlook. This time with a better quotation... I hope
Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecha...@gmail.com] wrote
Fair enough. But we can mitigate this risk on the IoProcessor too, by
pulling out of the queue all the messages for a session, until the
On 4/18/11 12:14 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Le Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:26:42 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 4/18/11 10:01 AM, Steve Ulrich wrote:
Hi!
I'm sceptical about it. Maybe you could design it in a way, that
the IoProcessor is replaceable, so one could test
Unconditional wait() in Read- and WriteWorker of SerialSessionImpl
--
Key: DIRMINA-830
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-830
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved FTPSERVER-405.
Resolution: Fixed
Make Map field final (improve thread-safety)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved FTPSERVER-406.
Resolution: Fixed
StringBuffer = StringBuilder for internal use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved FTPSERVER-407.
Resolution: Fixed
Wherever possible, immutable private fields should be marked final
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Vermillard updated DIRMINA-830:
--
Attachment: patch.diff
Unconditional wait() in Read- and WriteWorker of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13021067#comment-13021067
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-830:
---
Since I can't reproduce the bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otto Frost updated SSHD-118:
raf.close()
should be changed to
if (raf!=null)
raf.close();
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13021105#comment-13021105
]
Bobby Powers commented on SSHD-118:
---
This is interesting, I think I've seen the same thing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otto Frost updated SSHD-118:
Environment:
windows xp professional sun jdk 1.5.0.22, jre 1.6
windows 2003 server SP2 sun jdk jre 1.5.0.22
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13021112#comment-13021112
]
Bobby Powers commented on SSHD-118:
---
do you mean on line 383 of NativeSshFile? Under what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otto Frost updated SSHD-118:
Description:
I logon, and then
put xx xx
rename xx yy
O1706@WKE198515 ~
$ sftp -oport=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otto Frost updated SSHD-118:
Description:
I logon, and then
put xx xx
rename xx yy
O1706@WKE198515 ~
$ sftp -oport= a@localhost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13021155#comment-13021155
]
Otto Frost commented on SSHD-118:
-
if (raf!=null)
raf.close();
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otto Frost updated SSHD-118:
Description:
I logon, and then
put xx xx
rename xx yy
O1706@WKE198515 ~
$ sftp -oport= a@localhost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13021164#comment-13021164
]
Otto Frost commented on SSHD-118:
-
Added fix for the real problem in the description
After a second (third ?) thought, sounds like trying to have only one
queue per IoProcessor is not really a good idea.
It brings little, and cost a lot. Let's get back to one session/one
writing queue.
Thanks for the good feedback, Steve !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
[PATCH] more specific docstring for Command interface
-
Key: SSHD-119
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-119
Project: MINA SSHD
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bobby Powers updated SSHD-119:
--
Attachment: 0001-Command-update-javadoc-for-start-to-be-more-specific.patch
[PATCH] more specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bobby Powers updated SSHD-119:
--
Attachment: (was:
0001-Command-update-javadoc-for-start-to-be-more-specific.patch)
[PATCH] more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bobby Powers updated SSHD-119:
--
Attachment: 0001-Command-update-javadoc-for-start-to-be-more-specific.patch
[PATCH] more specific
28 matches
Mail list logo
