On 9/2/11 6:58 PM, sebb wrote:
The NOTICE file is wrong.
It should start with:
Apache MINA SSHD
Copyright 2xxx-2011 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed by
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
The rest of the NOTICE file is for
Note that I don't have any problems with the way we do things in mina,
but fwiw, the core mina library has exactly the same structure:
* a binary / source distributions at http://www.apache.org/dist//mina/2.0.4/
this source distribution also contains the code in the src directory
*
Sorry, on the first sentence, I meant I don't have any problems with
*changing* the way we do things
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 09:56, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that I don't have any problems with the way we do things in mina,
but fwiw, the core mina library has exactly the same
On 9/5/11 9:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Note that I don't have any problems with the way we do things in mina,
but fwiw, the core mina library has exactly the same structure:
* a binary / source distributions at http://www.apache.org/dist//mina/2.0.4/
this source distribution also
On 5 September 2011 09:14, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 9/5/11 9:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Note that I don't have any problems with the way we do things in mina,
but fwiw, the core mina library has exactly the same structure:
* a binary / source distributions at
I'm cancelling this vote to fix the legal files.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:19, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
A vote for this long overdue release of SSHD 0.6.0 which contains a
bunch of improvements and bug fixes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
2nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
The legal files have been fixed and empty dirs removed, no other changes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849version=12315514
The staging repo is available at:
On 5 September 2011 10:39, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
2nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
The legal files have been fixed and empty dirs removed, no other changes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
Hi,
I think the md5sums do not match
md5sum apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.zip
1e50358e4aadb855e51f91d0bb95db00 *apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.zip
md5sum apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
1bca2f231f455aa8864cd9a5c33125a6 *apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
curl -k
Doh, you're right. I wonder if I hit
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-4347 ...
I've uploaded a new set of artifacts from the same tag at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-028
It now seems to have correct md5.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 15:37, Will
On 5 September 2011 14:58, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Doh, you're right. I wonder if I hit
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-4347 ...
I've uploaded a new set of artifacts from the same tag at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-028
It now
Done.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 16:04, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 September 2011 14:58, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Doh, you're right. I wonder if I hit
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-4347 ...
I've uploaded a new set of artifacts from the same tag at
Missing SVN EOL properties
--
Key: SSHD-143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-143
Project: MINA SSHD
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Sebb
Missing or incorrect SVN eol-style properties - see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb updated SSHD-143:
--
Attachment: sshd-0.6.0.sh
Missing SVN EOL properties
--
Key: SSHD-143
On 5 September 2011 10:39, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
2nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
The legal files have been fixed and empty dirs removed, no other changes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
Cancelling this vote due to the missing AL header.
On the optional dependecies, slf4j-api is actually mandatory. Also
slf4j requires one implementation at runtime, so we include
slf4j-simple (though we use slf4j-log4j in the tests). Bouncycastle
and apr are included, because even if they are
On 5 September 2011 16:23, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Cancelling this vote due to the missing AL header.
On the optional dependecies, slf4j-api is actually mandatory. Also
So is that a bug in the POM?
slf4j requires one implementation at runtime, so we include
slf4j-simple
No, slf4j-api is mandatory as a a transitive dependency of mina-core
while slf4j-log4j is flagged as test.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 17:35, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 September 2011 16:23, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Cancelling this vote due to the missing AL header.
On the
3nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
I've fixed the missing header and removed the duplicate source
distribution from the staging repo.
A number of issues have been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849version=12315514
The staging repo is available
+1
Jeff
On Sep 5, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
3nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
I've fixed the missing header and removed the duplicate source
distribution from the staging repo.
A number of issues have been fixed:
Hi Guillaume,
-1 from me.
When I run
mvn clean package
from the zipped source package, I get a failed test, specifically
org.apache.sshd.SftpTest.testReadWriteWithOffset
---
Test set: org.apache.sshd.SftpTest
21 matches
Mail list logo
