[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-634) Suspicious read buffer re-use in write command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15130093#comment-15130093 ] Goldstein Lyor commented on SSHD-634: - Without going into too much details, using a lot of small buffers

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-634) Suspicious read buffer re-use in write command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15130076#comment-15130076 ] Eugene Petrenko commented on SSHD-634: -- Thanks. I will apply it shortly. Will try to put similar code

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-634) Suspicious read buffer re-use in write command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15130098#comment-15130098 ] Eugene Petrenko commented on SSHD-634: -- Thanks! Watched/Voted for related issue. My idea was to use 2

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-634) Suspicious read buffer re-use in write command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15130248#comment-15130248 ] Goldstein Lyor commented on SSHD-634: - This is more or less what is happening now anyway, and after

[VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

Hi, Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in some cases to a 100% CPU consumption. It also fixes the IoProcessor loop exit conditions. Another two bugs found by Radovan Semancik has been

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRMINA-1026) Session may be removed twice from the removedSession queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-1026. Resolution: Fixed Should be fixed with

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRMINA-1001) mina2.0.9 session.close cpu100%

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-1001. Resolution: Fixed Should be fixed with

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRMINA-1006) mina2.0.9 NioProcessor thread make cpu 100%

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-1006. Resolution: Fixed Should be fixed with

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Jeff On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > +1 > > Jeff > > > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > > > This release fixed a

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-635) potential hang in AuthFuture.verify(Long.MAX_VALUE) on error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15130432#comment-15130432 ] Oliver Stöneberg commented on SSHD-635: --- Thanks a lot. It's quite easy for me to reproduce this and

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-635) potential hang in AuthFuture.verify(Long.MAX_VALUE) on error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15130505#comment-15130505 ] Goldstein Lyor commented on SSHD-635: - If you do find out, it would help if you could post some code

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Jeff > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in > some cases to a 100% CPU consumption. > It

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Build works fine, all test cases passing On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi, > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in > some cases to

[jira] [Resolved] (SSHD-639) Review code and reduce buffer re-use

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Goldstein Lyor resolved SSHD-639. - Resolution: Fixed > Review code and reduce buffer re-use > > >

Applying SSHD-639 into version 1.1 and releasing 1.1.1

Hi Guilluame, I have successfully completed SSHD-639 that took care of an issue reported in SSHD-634 - namely the possibility of session decode buffer corruption due to re-using it in order to write the response. Just out of curiosity I applied it to 1.1 (with a few adjustments) and all tests