Re: CumulativeProtocolDecoder and UDP

2016-03-01 Thread Ashish
Agree, that's why the protocol shift to Application layer, meaning you emulate what TCP does like how many packets and their sequence to order them at receiving layer for meaningful interpretation. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Mondain wrote: > Ashish, just be aware that

Re: CumulativeProtocolDecoder and UDP

2016-03-01 Thread Mondain
Ashish, just be aware that with UDP, some of your data may never arrive; that's the nature of the protocol. Paul On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:48 PM Ashish wrote: > TCP handles fragmentation at its level, but for UDP you have to do it > at application layer meaning UDP data

Re: CumulativeProtocolDecoder and UDP

2016-03-01 Thread Ashish
TCP handles fragmentation at its level, but for UDP you have to do it at application layer meaning UDP data has to carry message sequences and then you merge them at receiving end. Here you packets can come in different order do you got to keep them somewhere before complete message is

Re: CumulativeProtocolDecoder and UDP

2016-03-01 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 01/03/16 16:58, tunca a écrit : > Our customer has strange requirement about merging multiple udp/TCP packages > to create a single message. > There is a well defined protocol that defines message boundaries. > The decoder is working good with TCP packages. It can create a single > message

Re: CumulativeProtocolDecoder and UDP

2016-03-01 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 01/03/16 15:05, tunca a écrit : > Hi Trustin, > We're using Mina Core 2.0.9. Have you checked with 2.0.13 ? > The Udp Cumulative Protocol doesn't seem to accumulate. > The Decoder is working with TCP however, with UDP the > The size of the IoBuffer doesn't increase. Using such a protocol

Re: CumulativeProtocolDecoder and UDP

2016-03-01 Thread tunca
Hi Trustin, We're using Mina Core 2.0.9. The Udp Cumulative Protocol doesn't seem to accumulate. The Decoder is working with TCP however, with UDP the The size of the IoBuffer doesn't increase. Best Regards Tunca -- View this message in context:

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-660) Add support for authentication using signed client/server keys

2016-03-01 Thread Goldstein Lyor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15173633#comment-15173633 ] Goldstein Lyor commented on SSHD-660: - See also [OpenSSH Protocol.certkeys

[jira] [Created] (SSHD-660) Add support for authentication using signed client/server keys

2016-03-01 Thread Goldstein Lyor (JIRA)
Goldstein Lyor created SSHD-660: --- Summary: Add support for authentication using signed client/server keys Key: SSHD-660 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-660 Project: MINA SSHD