[jira] [Closed] (SSHD-1280) Clarification of ConnectFuture#cancel(), AuthFuture#cancel(), OpenFuture#cancel behaviours if connection,auhentication,channel open are already done respectively

2022-07-21 Thread Lyor Goldstein (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lyor Goldstein closed SSHD-1280. Resolution: Information Provided > Clarification of ConnectFuture#cancel(), AuthFuture#cancel(), >

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-1280) Clarification of ConnectFuture#cancel(), AuthFuture#cancel(), OpenFuture#cancel behaviours if connection,auhentication,channel open are already done respectively

2022-07-21 Thread Lyor Goldstein (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17569606#comment-17569606 ] Lyor Goldstein commented on SSHD-1280: -- I disagree with the need to re-phrase the documentation - I

[jira] [Assigned] (SSHD-1279) Is it possible to detect Input protocol is scp and sftp at provider level?

2022-07-21 Thread Lyor Goldstein (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lyor Goldstein reassigned SSHD-1279: Assignee: Lyor Goldstein > Is it possible to detect Input protocol is scp and sftp at

[jira] [Resolved] (SSHD-1279) Is it possible to detect Input protocol is scp and sftp at provider level?

2022-07-21 Thread Lyor Goldstein (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lyor Goldstein resolved SSHD-1279. -- Resolution: Information Provided > Is it possible to detect Input protocol is scp and sftp at

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-1279) Is it possible to detect Input protocol is scp and sftp at provider level?

2022-07-21 Thread Lyor Goldstein (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17569603#comment-17569603 ] Lyor Goldstein commented on SSHD-1279: -- Easy - {{FileSystemProvider}} cannot be implemented over

Re: Exception in filter (was: Re: [Vote] MINA 2.2.0 release)

2022-07-21 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 21/07/2022 15:38, Christoph John wrote: Hi Emmanuel, I took a look at this and it seems the two latches were a red herring. One is for the initiator (connector) and the other one for the acceptor that are used in the unit test. I must admit I haven't spent enough time to unerstand

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.9.0 (2nd try)

2022-07-21 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 Le lun. 18 juil. 2022 à 09:51, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > > I've staged another candidate release at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1076 > Git tag: > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0 > Issues solved: >

Re: Exception in filter (was: Re: [Vote] MINA 2.2.0 release)

2022-07-21 Thread Christoph John
Hi Emmanuel, I took a look at this and it seems the two latches were a red herring. One is for the initiator (connector) and the other one for the acceptor that are used in the unit test. However, I think I found the root cause for the failing unit tests. We have an AbstractIoHandler which