Hi Guillaume,
Did you update the site generation as well?
Gary
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023, 12:48 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Thx for pointing out the weird sha files. I've fixed them and removed the
> sha256 ones.
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> Le sam. 14 oct. 2023 à 17:13, Gary D. Gregory a
> écrit :
>
>
Thx for pointing out the weird sha files. I've fixed them and removed the
sha256 ones.
Guillaume
Le sam. 14 oct. 2023 à 17:13, Gary D. Gregory a
écrit :
> Hi All:
>
> +1
>
> I am reviewing the src zip file:
>
> - ASC OK
>
> - Can't validate SHA file with:
> shasum --check
tomaswolf merged PR #424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/424
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi All:
+1
I am reviewing the src zip file:
- ASC OK
- Can't validate SHA file with:
shasum --check apache-sshd-2.11.0-src.zip.sha512
This is due to non-standard format for the file.
Eyeballing the file looks OK when compared to shasum -a 512 output.
- IMO, the VOTE email should
Hi again:
I should add that there is no way that I can tell if we've broken binary
compatibility (or source compatibility) since there is no use of japicmp (or
revapi or ...)
Gary
On 2023/10/14 14:04:07 "Gary D. Gregory" wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> +1
>
> Lots of comments on this one; I am
Hi All:
+1
Lots of comments on this one; I am reviewing the src zip file:
- ASC OK
- Can't validate SHA file with:
shasum --check apache-sshd-2.9.3-src.zip.sha512
This is due to non-standard format for the file.
Eyeballing the file looks OK when compared to shasum -a 512 output.
-
