Ok, here is the result :
+1 : Julien (b) , Ashish, Edouard, Niklas (b), Jeff, Maarten (b), Mark
(b), Emmanuel (b)
+/-0 : none
-1 : none
So it's 5 binding +1 votes for the release out of 8 +1.
I will try to cut the release tonite or tomorrow.
Many thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Le Thu, 28 May 2009 22:34:39 +0200,
Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com a écrit :
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
BTW you forgot to generate transport-serial jar.
That was actually on purpose since I wasn't sure if I was allowed to
Le Thu, 28 May 2009 23:09:23 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org a écrit :
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
BTW you forgot to generate transport-serial jar.
That was actually on purpose since
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
You can upload, it's ASL code only. You need an LGPL lib for using it.
Can't see a problem for uploading it to people. But it's part of MINA
and need to be reviewed as rest of jars for releasing.
Ah, cool, then
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
BTW you forgot to generate transport-serial jar.
That was actually on purpose since I wasn't sure if I was allowed to
upload it to people and didn't have the time to investigate it :-)
/niklas
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
BTW you forgot to generate transport-serial jar.
That was actually on purpose since I wasn't sure if I was allowed to
upload it to people and didn't have the time to investigate
[X] +1: Yes, release MINA-2.0.0-M6
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
it was expected to be available last week, sorry for the delay.
Here is an official vote for a 2.0.0-M6 mina release, which fixes a few but
serious issues, including one
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Niklas, can you tell us you you managed to generate those binaries ?
mvn -DaltDeploymentRepository=local::default::file:///tmp/mina clean
package gpg:sign deploy
# clean up unnecessary GPG signed files
scp -r
Hi,
it was expected to be available last week, sorry for the delay.
Here is an official vote for a 2.0.0-M6 mina release, which fixes a few
but serious issues, including one major regression I injected in the code.
The code has been moved to a branch, on revision 778682 :
Le Tue, 26 May 2009 15:08:54 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org a écrit :
Hi,
it was expected to be available last week, sorry for the delay.
Here is an official vote for a 2.0.0-M6 mina release, which fixes a
few but serious issues, including one major regression I injected in
Envoyé le : Mardi, 26 Mai 2009, 15h24mn 58s
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release MINA 2.0.0-M6
[X ] +1: Yes, release MINA-2.0.0-M6
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
it was expected to be available last week, sorry for the delay.
Here is an official
[X ] +1: Yes, release MINA-2.0.0-M6
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
it was expected to be available last week, sorry for the delay.
Here is an official vote for a 2.0.0-M6 mina release, which fixes a few but
serious issues, including
Guys,I've had no response to my query about the exception that i get in M6
but not in M5. It is critical to setting up the Acceptors and if I have
missed something please let me know; I would hate to see M6 go out with such
an obvious difference.
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:35, Mondain mond...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,I've had no response to my query about the exception that i get in M6
but not in M5. It is critical to setting up the Acceptors and if I have
missed something please let me know; I would hate to see M6 go out with
such
an
Shawn Pearce wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:35, Mondain mond...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,I've had no response to my query about the exception that i get in M6
but not in M5. It is critical to setting up the Acceptors and if I have
missed something please let me know; I would hate to see M6
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
I didn't produced any package, as the mavn assembly plugin is deeply bugged
Binaries available at http://people.apache.org/~ngn/mina/2.0.0-M6/
[X] +1 : Yes, release MINA-2.0.0-M6
/niklas
+1
On May 26, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org
wrote:
I didn't produced any package, as the mavn assembly plugin is
deeply bugged
Binaries available at http://people.apache.org/~ngn/mina/2.0.0-M6/
[X] +1
+1
Maarten
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On May 26, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org
wrote:
I didn't produced any package, as the mavn assembly plugin is
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
I didn't produced any package, as the mavn assembly plugin is deeply bugged
Binaries available at http://people.apache.org/~ngn/mina/2.0.0-M6/
Niklas, can you tell us you you
19 matches
Mail list logo
