On Mar 30, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
I have done this test on my desktop, with a client on my desktop,
or with a
client on another desktop (100 Mb/s ethernet). The volume of
transfered data
is not enormous, it's around 1kb per message, so for 2000 messages per
second, it's
Alex Karasulu a écrit :
Emmanuel,
I have done some more test, on the 'big server' ( 8 CPUs), changing the
SocketAcceptor initialization with something like what you suggested :
tcpAcceptor = new SocketAcceptor(
Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors(),
threadPoolExecutor
James Im a écrit :
Ok, so you seems to have missed a 'go fast' parameter.
In my opinion, it is not your fault. It is mina that is not being user
friendly. MINA should take care of these details itself.
This optimization wisdom should be capture into mina so that everyone is
not forced to be
:26 AM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: High latency in Mina ?
Hi guys,
I'm currently doing some performance tests on Apache Directory Server, and
I'm a little bit puzzled but some of the results I get. First of all, we are
using MINA-1.0.1, with different JVM (JRockit, IBM, Sun) on different
Subject: High latency in Mina ?
Hi guys,
I'm currently doing some performance tests on Apache Directory Server, and
I'm a little bit puzzled but some of the results I get. First of all, we
are
using MINA-1.0.1, with different JVM (JRockit, IBM, Sun) on different
platforms (Linux, Mac OSx
Csaba Endre Simon a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
Hi Csaba,
I'm a little bit puzzled but some of the results I get. First of all,
we are
using MINA-1.0.1, with different JVM (JRockit, IBM, Sun) on different
platforms (Linux, Mac OSx).
The published results are on Linux? What kernel are you
Oops, I just forgot the reply all...
---BeginMessage---
Greg,
I have done some more test, on the 'big server' ( 8 CPUs), changing the
SocketAcceptor initialization with something like what you suggested :
tcpAcceptor = new SocketAcceptor(
just forgot the reply all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greg Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:34:40 +0200
Subject: Re: High latency in Mina ?
Greg,
I have done some more test, on the 'big server' ( 8 CPUs), changing
Emmanuel,
I have done some more test, on the 'big server' ( 8 CPUs), changing the
SocketAcceptor initialization with something like what you suggested :
tcpAcceptor = new SocketAcceptor(
Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors(),
threadPoolExecutor );
(we already have this
That is correct, this is a relevant fix for improved performance on most
server machines, especially with multi-core quickly becoming ubiquitous. It
wouldn't be hard to change the default constructor. Perhaps you could open a
JIRA issue to request this, or submit a small patch, as MINA developers
10 matches
Mail list logo
