On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
is there any reason why this stupid Hudson *always* fail when we commit some
new code, and one hour later come back with again 6 useless mails telling us
that Hey, sorry, I was totally f*cked up last time I sent you
Ok, guys,
sorry for my overreaction...
Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
If we look at the build history, we see that we don't have that many
failures. The problem is that those failures seems to be time-dependent.
The JDK 1.6/Windows build are also in constant failure,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Sounds like you are pissed now, try to breath ;)
I'm agree for releasing 2.0 now.
+1
/niklas
Hi guys,
is there any reason why this stupid Hudson *always* fail when we commit
some new code, and one hour later come back with again 6 useless mails
telling us that Hey, sorry, I was totally f*cked up last time I sent
you 6 mails ?
If Hudson can't inform us when there are *real* errors,
It may be worth looking into whether we can use Bamboo which is much
better at CI. Its an atlassian project and I think it falls under the
usual free open source license.
Jeff
On Feb 20, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
is there any reason why this stupid Hudson
I got Hudson running @work without a trouble for a year.
Look like ASF one is overload or something like that..
If infra got bamboo or continuum or anything else installed in a stable
way I'm +1 for moving.
Le Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:04:30 -0700,
Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org a écrit :
It may
