On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
snip/
I know that having a core that do not rely on some other lib is a good
feature.
But is code dup worth it ? I personnaly hate it but i'm not saying we
absolutely should avoid it
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:04:02 +0200
Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
snip/
I know that having a core that do not rely on some other lib is a
good feature. But is code dup worth it ? I personnaly hate it but
i'm not saying we absolutely should avoid it
Julien Vermillard wrote:
snip/
More seriously, minimising core dependencies is important, I know you
all use maven and don't care, but a full lib for a 200 LoC class it's a
bit ridiculous for me, but if it's used in critical code, and we deeply
need update and fixes, why not.
I would also
with them
my 2 cents :)
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
- Message d'origine
De : Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mercredi, 13 Août 2008, 12h26mn 16s
Objet : Commons Codec Base64 Was : Re: Re : svn commit
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
snip/
I know that having a core that do not rely on some other lib is a good feature.
But is code dup worth it ? I personnaly hate it but i'm not saying we
absolutely should avoid it specially when we're talking about only one class ...
Well, we have to balance
