On Dec 11, 2007 11:35 PM, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very interesting because I have also been working on a MINA based appender !
> I haven't done extensive testing yet, and haven't run into that problem yet.
> probably because the MINA code was not emitting logging events
> (log
Very interesting because I have also been working on a MINA based appender !
I haven't done extensive testing yet, and haven't run into that problem yet.
probably because the MINA code was not emitting logging events
(log-levels not high enough)
But I was also worried about the cyclic dependency .
Hi folks,
Someone reported a very interesting use case for MINA. The user was
using MINA to implement Log4J Appender. He is also using Log4J as his
logging framework via SLF4J. This is a kind of cyclic dependency, and
there's much more behind that - a dead lock. It just sounds weird
that this
