Re: [MINA 3.0] filter chains

2011-08-24 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote: But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some management bits in the session can

trunk as 3.0 ?

2011-08-24 Thread Julien Vermillard
Hi, Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0 dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility. WDYT ? Julien

Re: [MINA 3.0] filter chains

2011-08-24 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote: But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm

Re : [MINA 3.0] filter chains

2011-08-24 Thread Edouard De Oliveira
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote: But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some management bits in the session can switch on/off some filters why do we want to complicate the coder 's life

Re: trunk as 3.0 ?

2011-08-24 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote: Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0 dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility. +1 /niklas

Re: [MINA 3.0] filter chains

2011-08-24 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote: On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote: for mina 3 i indeed was wondering if somehow we could use @ to prevent bloated FSM declaration code and found this interesting

Re: [MINA 3.0] filter chains

2011-08-24 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM,

Re: trunk as 3.0 ?

2011-08-24 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 8/24/11 9:09 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote: Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0 dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility. +1 /niklas Go ahead --

Re: trunk as 3.0 ?

2011-08-24 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Sounds good. Regards, Alan On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0 dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility. WDYT ? Julien

Re : trunk as 3.0 ?

2011-08-24 Thread Edouard De Oliveira
Sounds ok   Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0 dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility. WDYT ? Julien

Re: Re : [MINA 3.0] filter chains

2011-08-24 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote: On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote: But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some management bits in the session can