On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
management bits in the session can
Hi,
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
WDYT ?
Julien
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
management bits in the session can switch on/off some filters why do we want
to complicate the coder 's life
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@gmail.com wrote:
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
+1
/niklas
On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
for mina 3 i indeed was wondering if somehow we could use @ to prevent
bloated FSM declaration code and found this interesting
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM,
On 8/24/11 9:09 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@gmail.com wrote:
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
+1
/niklas
Go ahead
--
Sounds good.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
WDYT ?
Julien
Sounds ok
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
WDYT ?
Julien
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Edouard De Oliveira
doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
management bits in the session can
11 matches
Mail list logo