Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-31 Thread Julien Vermillard
Ok let's close the vote for real :) Thanks to the voters. -- Julien Vermillard http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/ On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for the mistake. yes I can wait a little ;) -- Julien Vermillard

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-30 Thread Julien Vermillard
sorry for the mistake. yes I can wait a little ;) -- Julien Vermillard http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/ On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Le 7/29/13 9:38 PM, Julien Vermillard a écrit : With my +1, we have 3 binding +1 : - Emmanuel

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-29 Thread Julien Vermillard
With my +1, we have 3 binding +1 : - Emmanuel Lécharny - Ashish Paliwal - Julien Vermillard no 0 or -1. I'll publish this release and push the announces. Thanks, -- Julien Vermillard http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/ On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-29 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 7/29/13 9:38 PM, Julien Vermillard a écrit : With my +1, we have 3 binding +1 : - Emmanuel Lécharny - Ashish Paliwal - Julien Vermillard no 0 or -1. I'll publish this release and push the announces. It's a bit early... Especially considering that the vote has been started on a

[VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-27 Thread Julien Vermillard
Hi, After a few packaging fix, here an attempt to release M2 of MINA 3.0.0 Changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DIRMINA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.0.0-trunk%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC A temporary tag has been created

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-27 Thread Jeff MAURY
Julien, in the staged repo, the benchmarks and benchmarks2 have no Javadocs jars. Jeff On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, After a few packaging fix, here an attempt to release M2 of MINA 3.0.0 Changelog:

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-27 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 7/27/13 11:40 AM, sebb a écrit : On 27 July 2013 09:38, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: On nexus, we have too many things in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-027/org/apache/mina/mina-parent/3.0.0-M2/, like the zip for sources. It does not make

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-27 Thread Ashish
Build runs fine. Just one thing the binary pkg Notice should have mention of SLF4J and protobufs rt? On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote: Le 7/27/13 11:40 AM, sebb a écrit : On 27 July 2013 09:38, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: On

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-27 Thread Julien Vermillard
SLF4J is MIT licensed, so no need of NOTICE (but it's in the LICENSE file) http://slf4j.org/license.html same for protobuf : http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/COPYING.txt -- Julien Vermillard http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/ On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Ashish

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2

2013-07-27 Thread Ashish
Got it :) +1 On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.comwrote: SLF4J is MIT licensed, so no need of NOTICE (but it's in the LICENSE file) http://slf4j.org/license.html same for protobuf : http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/COPYING.txt --