://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
- Message d'origine
De : Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 17 Avril 2009, 21h04mn 33s
Objet : Re: svn commit: r766111
-
/mina/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoggingFilter.java
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Agreeing with Edouard it's more like a bug fix, but if it's a problem
we can do the deprecation move.
It certainly somewhat academic and I don't think there at lot of users
of these methods. I would be fine with
I would favor Ashish proposal - ie, deprecating the old method, but
keep the fix too.
It's Sai proposal :-)
Hey, are you back from your vacation???
- ashish
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:24 PM, edeolive...@apache.org wrote:
- public LogLevel getExceptionCaughtLoglevel() {
+ public LogLevel getExceptionCaughtLogLevel() {
This breaks the API, something we promised not to do after M4. Are we
still okay with this change?
/niklas
Can we deprecate the old method and add the new one to keep up the promise?
Sai Pullabhotla
Phone: (402) 408-5753
Fax: (402) 408-6861
www.jMethods.com
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:24 PM, edeolive...@apache.org wrote:
/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoggingFilter.java
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:24 PM, edeolive...@apache.org wrote:
- public LogLevel getExceptionCaughtLoglevel() {
+ public LogLevel getExceptionCaughtLogLevel() {
This breaks the API, something we promised not to do
- Message d'origine
De : Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 17 Avril 2009, 21h04mn 33s
Objet : Re: svn commit: r766111 -
/mina/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoggingFilter.java
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:24 PM
