John Gibs
John Gibson
Sign up for an account on xircles.codehaus.org then you can use that
account to login to jira
On Saturday, 18 January 2014, B. K. Oxley (binkley)
wrote:
> Thanks, Anders.
>
> How do I log into your JIRA? Account creation indicates I need an admin.
>
> Cheers,
> Brian
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 201
Thanks, Anders.
How do I log into your JIRA? Account creation indicates I need an admin.
Cheers,
Brian
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Please create a JIRA ticket (with patch) as explained here:
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/issue-tracking.ht
Hi,
I'd like to release version 33 of the mojo-parent pom and the version 14 of
the mojo-sandbox-parent pom.
These are the poms used as parents of all our plugins (production &
pre-release & sandbox)
Note that you will need now at least mvn >= 2.2.1 to build mojo-parent
and mojo-sandbox-parent.
gil
Michael O
Ok, I'm good then. For now. :-)
/Anders
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Tony Chemit wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:13:08 +0100
> Anders Hammar wrote:
>
> > I see that the version of maven-project-info-reports-plugin in the
> > reportings section (of the reporting profile) is no longer decl
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:13:08 +0100
Anders Hammar wrote:
> I see that the version of maven-project-info-reports-plugin in the
> reportings section (of the reporting profile) is no longer declared. I
> think it should as it is not controlled by pluginManagement IIRC.
>
Yes you are right, done in r
I see that the version of maven-project-info-reports-plugin in the
reportings section (of the reporting profile) is no longer declared. I
think it should as it is not controlled by pluginManagement IIRC.
/Anders
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tony Chemit wrote:
> Pre-vote email (you never k
Pre-vote email (you never know!)
If ok I'd like to retry this.
We should be ok.
thanks,
tony.
--
Tony Chemit
tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
http://www.codelutin.com
email: che...@codelutin.com
twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit
-
Tony Chemit
edited a co
Tony Chemit
Tony Chemit
Tony Che
Looks good.
Also, I saw that you declare the version for the enforcer plugin twice (in
pluginmgmt and in plugin execution). Remove the one in plugin execution I
think.
/Anders
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Tony Chemit wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:58:28 +0100
> Tony Chemit wrote:
>
> >
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:58:28 +0100
Tony Chemit wrote:
>
> See MOJO-2004.
>
> Will rework the MOJO-2002 and remove then the MOJO-2004.
>
> Anders, Before I do the release, Could you check everything is ok to you ?
Is the comment ok with you Anders?
2.2.1
I also remove all stuff in
Tony Chemit
See MOJO-2004.
Will rework the MOJO-2002 and remove then the MOJO-2004.
Anders, Before I do the release, Could you check everything is ok to you ?
thanks,
tony
--
Tony Chemit
tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
http://www.codelutin.com
email: che...@codelutin.com
twitter: https:/
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:52:37 +0100
Anders Hammar wrote:
> Your call.
> If we re-roll, the MOJO-2004 should be deleted and that work be
> incorporated in MOJO-2002.
Ok let's re-roll then.
>
> /Anders
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Tony Chemit wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:43:
+1
Thanks Stephen!
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forgot to add my +1
>
>
> On 16 January 2014 15:11, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This release contains some fixes to critical regressi
Thanks Tony
On 16 January 2014 15:18, Tony Chemit wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:11:21 +
> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This release contains some fixes to critical regressions in the Ant tasks
> > and the Enforcer rule
>
> +1
>
> Notice that I updated MANIMALSNIFFER-32 (was
Forgot to add my +1
On 16 January 2014 15:11, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This release contains some fixes to critical regressions in the Ant tasks
> and the Enforcer rule
>
> We solved 6 issue:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12070&version=18881
>
>
> There
Your call.
If we re-roll, the MOJO-2004 should be deleted and that work be
incorporated in MOJO-2002.
/Anders
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Tony Chemit wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:43:15 +0100
> Anders Hammar wrote:
>
> > I'm now changing my vote to 0.
> >
> > I'm not happy about the i
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:43:15 +0100
Anders Hammar wrote:
> I'm now changing my vote to 0.
>
> I'm not happy about the incorrect/confusing comments but the parent should
> work.
So we can just re-roll another release (I just realize I did not add (take 2)
in the vote email title ;)).
It will be
I'm now changing my vote to 0.
I'm not happy about the incorrect/confusing comments but the parent should
work.
The release notes has changed and there are now four documented issues
fixed for this release.
/Anders
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > The vote mail says
Anders Ha
Anders H
Anders Hammar
Anders Ha
Anders H
Anders Hammar
>
> > The vote mail says that there were 2 solved issues, but the release notes
> > lists 3.
> > MOJO-2002 is marked "won't fix" but there was actually some change
> applied
> > which is wrong.
> Does it really matters ? for people using the mojo-parent I don't think so.
>
> I mark a issue as *Won'
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:51:05 +0100
Anders Hammar wrote:
> The vote mail says that there were 2 solved issues, but the release notes
> lists 3.
> MOJO-2002 is marked "won't fix" but there was actually some change applied
> which is wrong.
Does it really matters ? for people using the mojo-parent I
I'm sorry to say -1 here, once again.
The vote mail says that there were 2 solved issues, but the release notes
lists 3.
MOJO-2002 is marked "won't fix" but there was actually some change applied
which is wrong.
As part of MOJO-2002 there were some changes that were reverted, but there
is still so
Anders Hammar
36 matches
Mail list logo
