2008/7/18 Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've patched the plugin to use reflection for the new JAXP 1.4 method
>> so it now compiles under JDK5. Do you want me to commit the changes,
>> or I can attach them to an i
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've patched the plugin to use reflection for the new JAXP 1.4 method
> so it now compiles under JDK5. Do you want me to commit the changes,
> or I can attach them to an issue if you'd like to review it?
Go on.
--
Look
2008/7/18 Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sun suggests using the endorsed directories. As the JAXP API must
> typically be in the boot classpath (otherwise, it won't override the
> JRE's), I can't think of another possibility.
I've patched the plugin to use reflection for the new JAXP 1.4 m
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand the distinction, although with today's ever-growing
> monolithic JDK the two tend to go hand in hand (roll on JSR-277 :).
> Since JAXP is in the JDK how can we provide an alternative version
> that is 'endorsed
2008/7/17 Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First of all, if there's a problem, that's most possibly my fault.
> Nvertheless, please do not mismatch the JDK with the JAXP
> implementation. Even JDK 1.4 can use a current implementation of JAXP,
> assuming a proper classpath.
I understand the d
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This was added to fix MOJO-777. What's the consensus on the minimum
>> JDK requirements for mojos? The vast majority seem to be written for
>> JDK1.4 and slowly moving to JDK5. Is JDK6 acceptable, or should
>> reflec
Mark Hobson wrote:
I've just tried to build the xml-maven-plugin under Java5 and noticed
that TransformMojo uses a method introduced in JDK6:
TransformerFactory.newInstance(String factoryClassName,
ClassLoader classLoader)
This was added to fix MOJO-777. What's the consensus on the minimum
I've just tried to build the xml-maven-plugin under Java5 and noticed
that TransformMojo uses a method introduced in JDK6:
TransformerFactory.newInstance(String factoryClassName,
ClassLoader classLoader)
This was added to fix MOJO-777. What's the consensus on the minimum
JDK requirements for