Re: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system

2019-04-04 Thread Qing Lan
+1 to have a single build system Currently the way of publish and the way of doing CI test is very different. The instruction shown on the website should match the way we deliver it to the users. Having a single build process would simplify the maintainance cost and reach to the best

Re: MXNet 1.4.1 Release Proposal

2019-04-04 Thread Sheng Zha
Thanks Hagay for proposing the release and for Junru to volunteer to drive the release. I will help Junru as the committer for this release. -sz On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Junru Shao wrote: > Hi Hagay, > > I have some experiences in MXNet development, and would love to volunteer > for

Re: MXNet 1.4.1 Release Proposal

2019-04-04 Thread Junru Shao
Hi Hagay, I have some experiences in MXNet development, and would love to volunteer for driving this release. Thank you so much! Best, Junru On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:51 PM Hagay Lupesko wrote: > Hello MXNet community, > > As previously discussed in [0 > < >

MXNet 1.4.1 Release Proposal

2019-04-04 Thread Hagay Lupesko
Hello MXNet community, As previously discussed in [0 ], and per the feedback from Pedro, Kellen and Sheng, I'd like to propose releasing MXNet 1.4.1. MXNet 1.4.1 is a patch

Re: Discussing plans for next MXNet releases

2019-04-04 Thread Hagay Lupesko
Thanks Kellen, Pedro and Sheng for the feedback. Kellen - - Thanks for proposing 1.5 features. Kindly note them on the issue Sheng created: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14619 - For your 2.0 proposals - can you please update them in the issue Sheng created:

[Discussion] 1.5.0 roadmap

2019-04-04 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi all, In order to coordinate efforts for the next 1.5.0 minor release, let's join the discussion here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14619 Once we have some clarity on the items to track for 1.5.0 release from the discussion, we will come back to the list and propose a

[MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Backend choices during runtime

2019-04-04 Thread Marco de Abreu
Hello, I'd like to start a discussion about something that I've noticed being troublesome to maintain in the current version: Backend choices being made at compile time. Right now, the different backends and accelerators (CPU, cuda, mkl, AWS elastic inference, (future) AMD, openblas,TVM, etc)

Re: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system

2019-04-04 Thread Marco de Abreu
+1 towards having a single build system I'd like to add the benefit of this approach allowing us to have the same build logic across all operating systems. It would be great if we could make x86/Unix, x86/windows, x86/mac and ARM/Unix first class citizens from the beginning. -Marco Kellen

[MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system

2019-04-04 Thread Kellen Sunderland
Hello MXNet devs, I'd like to start a thread discussing what our build system should look like in MXNet 2.0. I'd propose that although the current make system has served us well in the past, we remove it along with the bump to 2.0. The end goal I'd like to see is that we have a clean build

Re: Requesting slack access

2019-04-04 Thread Hagay Lupesko
Hi Xiuquan, Slack invite sent - welcome to the MXNet community! Please slack me @Hagay Lupesko - would love to chat about how you guys are thinking about using MXNet. Hagay On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:24 AM Xiuquan Lv wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > > > > Please join me in the MXNet Slack

[RFC] Higher order gradient support in MXNet

2019-04-04 Thread Lin Yuan
Dear Community, Higher order gradient calculation is required for many applications. However, current MXNet only support higher order gradient for a very limited number of operators. We plan to support the higher order gradient calculation in the autograd package. A design proposal is ready for

Re: Reminder: MXNet Berlin User Group

2019-04-04 Thread Chance Bair
Correct, this is a pattern. As I am a relatively new joiner to MXNet, it might be good to elaborate on what users would want out of a remote user group. I would love to hear suggestions! Chance Bair On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:48 PM Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > > > Am 4. April 2019 13:29:28

Re: Reminder: MXNet Berlin User Group

2019-04-04 Thread Isabel Drost-Fromm
Am 4. April 2019 13:29:28 MESZ schrieb Chance Bair : >Again, there were no attendees. Is that a pattern, or was that just the case for the past two events? If the former, maybe we could brainstorm here what could be done to make the offer more attractive? Isabel -- This message was sent

Re: Reminder: MXNet Berlin User Group

2019-04-04 Thread Chance Bair
Again, there were no attendees. Chance Bair On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:07 PM Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Chance Bair wrote: > > This is a friendly reminder that MXNet Berlin User Group will be held > today > > at 6pm-7pm (CEST) / 9am-10am (PST). More

Re: Reminder: MXNet Berlin User Group

2019-04-04 Thread Isabel Drost-Fromm
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Chance Bair wrote: > This is a friendly reminder that MXNet Berlin User Group will be held today > at 6pm-7pm (CEST) / 9am-10am (PST). More info here: >

Requesting slack access

2019-04-04 Thread Xiuquan Lv
Dear MXNet community, Please join me in the MXNet Slack Community. Thanks Xiuquan Lv