RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Zhennan Qin

2019-04-30 Thread Zhao, Patric
Cong, Zhennan. Really great works and it makes the MXNet/Quantization flow outstanding over the world! > -Original Message- > From: Lv, Tao A [mailto:tao.a...@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 11:01 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Announcement] New

RE: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Refine the InferStorageType and memory planning pass

2019-04-09 Thread Zhao, Patric
BTW, "maintainability, testability and readability" is always our design goal from starting point of MKL-DNN integration :) > -Original Message- > From: Lv, Tao A [mailto:tao.a...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 11:03 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE:

RE: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

2019-04-07 Thread Zhao, Patric
Agree. Recently, we (Tao, Shufan, Pengxin) are trying to integrate the Intel MKL math functions into mshadow and MXNet. We have to go through two repos and make lots of tradeoff between them. If we can move mshadow into MXNet, it will be more flexible to redesign and refactor parts of legacy

RE: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system

2019-04-05 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1 single build system. > -Original Message- > From: Qing Lan [mailto:lanking...@live.com] > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:27 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system > > +1 to have a single build system > > Currently

RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Alex Zai

2019-03-31 Thread Zhao, Patric
Congratulation, Alex. Thank you to your helps for MKLDNN backend including tests, coverage, CI :) Looking forward more cooperation together. > -Original Message- > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 8:56 AM > To:

RE: Call for Ideas and Approaches to Community Building

2019-03-18 Thread Zhao, Patric
etups+and+Hangou > ts > > I also strongly agree with your 4). I think we should have a clear roadmap on > our wiki page and/or github repo. > > Again, welcome on board! > > Lin > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 7:33 AM Zhao, Patric > wrote: > > > V

RE: Call for Ideas and Approaches to Community Building

2019-03-17 Thread Zhao, Patric
Very great points! +1 for 4) and 5) > -Original Message- > From: Zach Boldyga [mailto:z...@scalabull.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 8:33 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Call for Ideas and Approaches to Community Building > > This is a great discussion,

RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Patric Zhao

2019-03-15 Thread Zhao, Patric
I am very glad to have this opportunity to contribute to the Apache/MXNet community :) Thanks all of the supports from the community and Intel. BR, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: MiraiWK WKCN [mailto:w...@live.cn] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 12:52 AM > To:

RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Kan Wu (@wkcn)

2019-02-18 Thread Zhao, Patric
Congratulation! We have the cooperation with Kan before and he is easy to communicate and very professional :) It's really deserved! > -Original Message- > From: Lv, Tao A [mailto:tao.a...@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:17 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org;

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-12 Thread Zhao, Patric
Update, the issue is fixed and the new patch release is out MKL-DNN 0.17.4. Tao filed a PR to update the MKLDNN version in the release 1.4.X https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14141 Thanks all of your helps :) --Patric > -Original Message- > From: Zhao,

RE: Third-party package tests for MXNet nightly builds

2019-02-11 Thread Zhao, Patric
Agree to track the 3rd party packages which make MXNet more prosperous :) Before building the CI, I suggest to create the related labels, like sockeye, gluonCV, gluonNLP, etc, in the GitHub and give the high priority for these issues/PR. So the issue/PR can be fixed quickly and these important

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Sheng, Thanks to raise this important issues. Sorry for the lack of validation since we don't have mac machine with earlier OS version in house. I will contact with MKL-DNN team for the supports of earlier versions of OSX but I'm a little afraid the fix needs some extra-time.

RE: Taxonomy on our cwiki

2019-01-19 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1, Good idea. It's not very easy to find out the related contents since lots of folders in the website. > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Zha [mailto:zhash...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2019 3:28 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Taxonomy on our cwiki

RE: Design proposal - MXNet end to end models - Models with data transformations

2019-01-16 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1 for this great proposal. MXNet will be more flexible and portable with this new feature :) Thanks, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: sandeep krishnamurthy [mailto:sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 8:47 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org >

[ANNOUNCE] MKLDNN becomes the default CPU backend in Apache/MXNet master branch

2019-01-11 Thread Zhao, Patric
Dear all, I am pleased to announce that the MKLDNN is the default CPU backend in the master branch for the Linux platform now. (note: the nightly build and release doesn't change) Really thanks to the great supports and joint works from the community. Feedbacks are highly appreciated :)

RE: [Annoucement] New Committer -- Da Zheng

2018-12-17 Thread Zhao, Patric
Congratulation, Da! Really thanks for your great supports and looking forward the more cooperation together :) > -Original Message- > From: Tianqi Chen [mailto:tqc...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 1:02 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: [Annoucement]

RE: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package

2018-12-10 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1, thanks for the efforts, Alex. > -Original Message- > From: Alex Zai [mailto:aza...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:00 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package > > Continuation from the following thread: >

RE: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

2018-12-08 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Steffen, I saw the draft of 1.4 release notes in here (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes). Is this near the final version? I'd like to add some descriptions of new quantization features enabled in 1.4. Is it OK? Thanks,

RE: LSTM regression (was RE: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package)

2018-11-28 Thread Zhao, Patric
MKL-DNN v0.17.1 is released https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/tree/v0.17.1 I have submitted the PR to pin this release version. Thanks, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: Zhao, Patric [mailto:patric.z...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 8:07 PM

RE: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package

2018-11-28 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1 for making MKL-DNN default in master branch first for broad testing :) My suggestion is to make MKL-DNN default on the master branch firstly after 1.4.0 releasing branch is cut off. That will help MKL-DNN backend to be widely used and tested by MXNet users who are building MXNet from

LSTM regression (was RE: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package)

2018-11-28 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Anirudh, The LSTM performance bug is fixed by MKL-DNN and PR in here (https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13417). I am still working on MKL-DNN team to get a patch release for MXNet 1.4 in 1 or 2 days. Will update the status soon. Thanks everyone. --Patric > -Original

RE: [Anouncement] New Committer: Tao Lv

2018-11-26 Thread Zhao, Patric
Congratulation, Tao. > -Original Message- > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 11:17 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Anouncement] New Committer: Tao Lv > > Welcome Tao! > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at

RE: MKLDNN performance in CI

2018-11-22 Thread Zhao, Patric
gt; Subject: RE: MKLDNN performance in CI > > I think yes, except the cpp test. > > -Original Message- > From: Zhao, Patric [mailto:patric.z...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:06 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: MKLDNN

RE: MKLDNN performance in CI

2018-11-22 Thread Zhao, Patric
Good point, Tao! Is this env enabled in all MKL-DNN CI? > -Original Message- > From: Lv, Tao A [mailto:tao.a...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 9:53 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: MKLDNN performance in CI > > Thanks for bringing this up, Marco. It's

RE: MKLDNN performance in CI

2018-11-22 Thread Zhao, Patric
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone :) Hi Marco, Thanks to raising this question. We will look into the details for CI test cases and Shufan will provide the 1:1 OP level performance data. In general, the CI tests is not performant cases which covered the different situations, even corner cases, for

RE: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package

2018-11-21 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Kellen, Thank you very much for your recognition for our works :) This is a great joint work from the community (Wu Jun, Zheng Da, etc.) and Intel team. We are continuously improving the quantization flow now and more amazing features will be ready soon. Thanks, --Patric >

RE: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0 release

2018-11-19 Thread Zhao, Patric
Thanks, Steffen. I think there is NO open issue to block the MKLDNN to GA now. BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the review and I think it can be merged in this week. Thanks, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: Steffen Rochel

RE: MKLDNN dynamically linked

2018-11-08 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1 for static link :) Feel free to let us know if anything we can help. > -Original Message- > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 7:30 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org > Subject: Re: MKLDNN

RE: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

2018-11-05 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Anton, Thanks for looking into the MKL-DNN PR. As my understanding of cwiki (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release), these features will go into 1.4 rather than patch release of 1.3.1. Feel free to correct me :) Thanks, --Patric >

RE: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package

2018-10-18 Thread Zhao, Patric
Thanks Alex for bringing up this proposal. As far as I know, applied to the MKL-DNN backend, MXNet is the most performant framework on CPU side now. Especially that the recent subgraph fusion feature boosts the performance a lot again. Thus, I think it’s worth to make it default and let more

RE: Proposal for subgraph based the graph optimization and quantization

2018-10-14 Thread Zhao, Patric
): https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/4d1338d1a3188c377a02b69d84cc7d3ead64dd86/MKLDNN_README.md#6 https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/4d1338d1a3188c377a02b69d84cc7d3ead64dd86/example/quantization/README.md Thanks, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: Zhao,

RE: Proposal for subgraph based the graph optimization and quantization

2018-10-03 Thread Zhao, Patric
Sent again and our PR are submitted (in 22 days ago). Please help take a review in case you're interested in :) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12530 Thanks the great suggestions from Jun, Da, Haibin and other committers. BR, --Patric From: Zhao, Patric Sent: Wednesday, August

RE: [Discuss] Next MXNet release

2018-10-01 Thread Zhao, Patric
o review the design doc and collect > feedback. > Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN > integration > as GA? > > Regards, > Steffen > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric > wrote: > > > Than

RE: [Discuss] Next MXNet release

2018-10-01 Thread Zhao, Patric
; Regards, > Steffen > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric wrote: > > > Thanks, Steffen. > > > > Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: > > > > 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove this item. >

RE: [Discuss] Next MXNet release

2018-09-29 Thread Zhao, Patric
Thanks, Steffen. Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove this item. 2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization by subgraph Design doc:

RE: Mentor changes

2018-09-27 Thread Zhao, Patric
Welcome, Jason, I think MXNet will achieve the great success as same as BigDL. Looking forward to working with you :) > -Original Message- > From: Hen [mailto:bay...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 8:23 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: Jim Jagielski ; Michael

RE: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

2018-08-21 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Roshani, Good notes :) Several items about the performance and MKL-DNN in the below, please help take a review. @Da, Alex, if anything about MKL-DNN is missed, feel free to add. *Performance improvement +Support for dot(dns, csr) = dns and dot(dns, csr.T) = dns on CPU

RE: Release blocker? - buggy topk Op

2018-08-16 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Leonard, Thanks to raising the issue of topk op. The root cause is from the current API design which used float data type to represent the integer index, and as we know, the float type could NOT express the large integer precisely. (I have no offense. I know I missed some backgrounds and I

Proposal for subgraph based the graph optimization and quantization

2018-08-14 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi MXNet owners and committers, A new proposal is posted in the wiki for the graph optimization and quantization approach. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimization+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN Really thanks for the supports from Zheng Da and

RE: Suggestions for Design Proposal Template

2018-08-08 Thread Zhao, Patric
s/feedback should be timely, whether it should be 1 or > 2 weeks can be discussed and agreed upon here. > > And also thank you for writing the design documents. > > I will come back with a more concrete set of proposals shortly on the dev@ > and meanwhile if others have suggestions

Suggestions for Design Proposal Template

2018-08-08 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi MXNet owner, We (Intel engineers) have already wrote up several design proposals and published into cwiki. So, I really like this documents and it make things very clear. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+Design+Proposal+Template Furthermore, I suggest adding a

RE: [DISCUSSION] Initial draft for MXNet roadmap

2018-07-05 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Steffen, It's really great to share the MXNet roadmap in the community. So, we have a clear picture and can align with the strategies. Regarding the Q3 plan, High quality support for MKL (incl. MKL-DNN), it's highly match with our plan. We will move the current solution into sub-graph and

RE: MKLDNN Integration Stable Release

2018-07-03 Thread Zhao, Patric
egration Stable Release > > * If all existing RNN integration tests pass with MKL-DNN build, this should > give > enough confidence? > * Also, I remember one of the community member saying "mxnet-mkl" pypi > package is not compiled with MKLDNN. Not sure about this

RE: MKLDNN Integration Stable Release

2018-07-03 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Alex, Regarding RNN, the first version of MKL-DNN RNN API is available in the MKL-DNN master branch. We have integrated it in our local branch and you can try our code (still in developments).

RE: Project Proposal for fused CPU RNN OPs to the release 1.3

2018-06-22 Thread Zhao, Patric
. > Regards, > Steffen > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:09 AM Zhao, Patric > wrote: > > > Hi MXNET owner, > > > > Recently, we (Intel engineers) have implemented the fused RNN > > operations > > (LSTM/GRU/vRNN) for the CPU, including bidirectional,

Project Proposal for fused CPU RNN OPs to the release 1.3

2018-06-21 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi MXNET owner, Recently, we (Intel engineers) have implemented the fused RNN operations (LSTM/GRU/vRNN) for the CPU, including bidirectional, multiple layers, inference/training. The LSTM and GRU PR was merged and vRNN code will be PR soon. The new APIs make the gluon and symbolic models much

RE: summary of 5/29 v1.2 post mortem & next release brainstorming call

2018-05-30 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Steffen, It's a good meetup and it's pity I missed to join. Regarding the proposal of 1.3, we (Intel team) want to add two items into the list. Please help take a review: 1) fused RNN operators for CPU (GRU/LSTM/vRNN) Lead contributor : Patric Zhao

RE: MXNet meetup in Seattle April 24th

2018-04-16 Thread Zhao, Patric
+1 for providing the offline materials :) > -Original Message- > From: Hen [mailto:bay...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 12:09 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: MXNet meetup in Seattle April 24th > > Will there be a write up/presentation upload for those

RE: blog for MXNet

2018-04-14 Thread Zhao, Patric
at Hen mentioned? > > > Also, I'm not familiar with the Apache blog and how you contribute. > > > I don't see info about it on Confluence or elsewhere. Certainly > > > sounds like something that needs some attention and to be part of > > > regular communications.

RE: blog for MXNet

2018-04-11 Thread Zhao, Patric
FYI, China user can't access medium.com :( > -Original Message- > From: Anirudh Acharya [mailto:anirudhk...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 6:31 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: blog for MXNet > > There is already an AWS Evangelist, Julien Simon, who

RE: Extend MXNET distributed training with MPI AllReduce

2018-03-29 Thread Zhao, Patric
@intel.com>; 'Rahul Huilgol' <rahulhuil...@gmail.com>; Ye, Jason Y <jason.y...@intel.com>; Zhang, Rong A <rong.a.zh...@intel.com>; Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> Subject: RE: Extend MXNET distributed training with MPI AllReduce For our current POC: b. Add

Extend MXNET distributed training with MPI AllReduce

2018-03-26 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi MXNET owners/developers, As you known, the AllReduce and Parameter Severs are two very popular distributed training modes in DL. Currently, MXNET only supports parameter server mode and is lack of AllReduce mode. Other frameworks, like tensorflow, pytorch, caffe, etc, can work with

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-23 Thread Zhao, Patric
t; Best regards, > Marco > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > MKL issues summary: > > > > Feel free to let me know if anything I missed. > > > > Totally, there’re 11 open issues in the github wi

MKLDNN Building Discussion in MXNET

2018-03-20 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi MXNET developers, Since the MKL-DNN is integrated into MXNET master in the last month, we saw there're some confusions about how to build the MKL-DNN and Intel MKL into MXNET. And several Github issues were opened and most of them have been fixed. But I think we still need to define a clear

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-16 Thread Zhao, Patric
-Original Message- > From: Zheng, Da [mailto:dzz...@amazon.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:06 AM > To: Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com>; steffenroc...@gmail.com; > dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com; Ye, Jason Y <jason.y...@intel.c

RE: MKLDNN Build (pre: call for contributions to next MXNet release)

2018-03-15 Thread Zhao, Patric
+source data to read clearly. > -Original Message- > From: Zhao, Patric [mailto:patric.z...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 8:29 AM > To: 'dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org' <dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org> > Cc: Huang, Jin1 <jin1.hu...@intel.com>; Da Z

RE: MKLDNN Build (pre: call for contributions to next MXNet release)

2018-03-15 Thread Zhao, Patric
age- > From: Zhao, Patric > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 9:33 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: Huang, Jin1 <jin1.hu...@intel.com> > Subject: MKLDNN Build (pre: call for contributions to next MXNet release) > > Hi Pedro, > > Thanks for th

MKLDNN Build (pre: call for contributions to next MXNet release)

2018-03-14 Thread Zhao, Patric
n the website. > > What's the performance increase of using MKL in osx when running in CPU > mode? > > Pedro > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > My fault, typo for your name, Larroy :( > > > > >

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-14 Thread Zhao, Patric
My fault, typo for your name, Larroy :( > -Original Message- > From: Zhao, Patric [mailto:patric.z...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 8:40 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; Huang, Jin1 <jin1.hu...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: call for contri

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-14 Thread Zhao, Patric
incubator- > mxnet/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L158 > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10072 > > It wrongly assumes that you have MKL installed, MKLDNN needs to check if > MKL is available before, or be disabled by default, also in non intel > platforms. > >

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-11 Thread Zhao, Patric
subset)? > - do you have performance measurements (or plan to measure) to include in > release notes? > - should we talk about the package at the Apr 24th meetup in Seattle? > > Steffen > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:40 AM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> > wrote: > >

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-10 Thread Zhao, Patric
the next > release. > At the moment, I'd not be in favour of having MKLDNN being part of it. > > Best regards, > Marco > > Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> schrieb am Sa., 10. März 2018, 02:30: > > > Hi Steffen, > > > > We'd like the MKL-DNN bac

RE: call for contributions to next MXNet release

2018-03-09 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi Steffen, We'd like the MKL-DNN backend can be included in the next release. We (Intel engineers) and Zheng-Da (AWS engineer) can work on it. Could you help add the item in the table? Thanks, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] >

RE: Assign JIRA issue

2018-03-08 Thread Zhao, Patric
@Chris please add into group too. > -Original Message- > From: YiZhi Liu [mailto:liuyi...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 8:40 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Assign JIRA issue > > Yes it is. Thanks! > > 2018-03-08 16:04 GMT-08:00 Chris Olivier

Could anyone help add me into slack group?

2018-02-02 Thread Zhao, Patric
Thanks, --Patric

RE: Intel Plan for the contribution to MXNET

2018-01-31 Thread Zhao, Patric
m>; Jiang, Wenting <wenting.ji...@intel.com>; Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> Subject: Re: Intel Plan for the contribution to MXNET Hi Patric, Thanks for the contribution. It’s great to see actions on developing INT8 inference for CPU! I have a few questions and hope to have your

RE: Unit tests removed

2018-01-31 Thread Zhao, Patric
Thanks, Chris, I agree the quality is the most important thing. We will try to enable these cases ASAP. ---Patric > -Original Message- > From: Chris Olivier [mailto:cjolivie...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 1:04 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Intel Plan for the contribution to MXNET

2018-01-31 Thread Zhao, Patric
Hi MXNET developers, We are from Intel Software and Service Group (SSG) and working on the performance optimization for MXNET on Intel Architecture (IA). Let me do a simple introduction about our ongoing projects. Any suggestions and comments are highly appreciated. 1) MKL-DNN