Hi Pedro,
Canonical added snap package for MXNet last year:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/4852
Would be good to verify if it works for your use case.
Anirudh
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Marco de Abreu <
marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a great idea!
Sounds like a great idea! Please also consider the issues labelled as Cpp
package on GitHub.
-Marco
Am 14.02.2018 6:48 nachm. schrieb "Pedro Larroy" <
pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp
> package depends on additional
Yes, it should be available at issues@. We were requested to note this
email down so it does not get forgotten. Would somebody mind documenting it?
-Marco
Am 14.02.2018 6:52 nachm. schrieb "Pedro Larroy" <
pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>:
> Is there a new alias to subscribe to get the Jira
*I don't see in pybind11 that it's claiming to be especially performant,
only that it's convenient in passing data back and forth.*
*Is it claimed somewhere that it is especially fast?*
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> Why Cython and not
Is there a new alias to subscribe to get the Jira notifications?
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> Ticket is available at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-15997
>
> -Marco
>
> Am 07.02.2018 7:09 nachm. schrieb
Hi
We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp
package depends on additional MXNet headers, nnvm and dmlc.
As far as I know we don't have a standalone package of MXNet with
library + headers.
I would like to create a deb package of MXNet for example which has
the
Why Cython and not just C++ with simple python bindings like
https://github.com/pybind/pybind11 ? What's the motivation?
Have we considered the trade offs between maintainability, speed and
tooling? Also this Cython code is not going to be portable as it would
be in C++, and has some learning