Re: Regarding joining slack channel

I haven't heard of gitter yet. Could you elaborate? On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Sebastian wrote: > It took us quite some effort to move everyone to the ASF supported slack > channel, so I don't see the point of moving away from that. > > -s > > > On 15.02.2018 13:26, Pedro

Re: MXNet and Cython

Speed isn't everything. It's the only thing. :) On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:52 AM, Pedro Larroy wrote: > I don't know about the speed, and it shouldn't be the only criteria to > do things. My main question is: Why Cython instead of C++, is there > data or a

Re: Regarding joining slack channel

It took us quite some effort to move everyone to the ASF supported slack channel, so I don't see the point of moving away from that. -s On 15.02.2018 13:26, Pedro Larroy wrote: What's the situation with slack vs gitter? Should we just move all the discussion to gitter? there was never any

Re: Regarding joining slack channel

What's the situation with slack vs gitter? Should we just move all the discussion to gitter? there was never any significant traffic in the slack channel anyway. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Chris Olivier wrote: > invited > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Chen HY

Re: MXNet package

Hi guys Thanks for your responses. I'm definitely interested and will have a look at the pointers provided. I did a small prototype yesterday to compile LeNet against MXNet outside the source tree and was able to get something to compile while adding libmxnet, libdmlc, nvvm includes, dmlc

Re: MXNet and Cython

I don't know about the speed, and it shouldn't be the only criteria to do things. My main question is: Why Cython instead of C++, is there data or a prototype that would show light into what is the best decision here? Regarding the bindings, as with boost::python seems it's a very thin wrapper