Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release

2018-09-30 Thread Steffen Rochel
Thanks Patrick. Updated roadmap and next release content. Patrick - suggest to send a reminder to review the design doc and collect feedback. Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN integration as GA? Regards, Steffen On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric wrote:

Re: Feedback request for new Java API

2018-09-30 Thread Naveen Swamy
Qing, thanks for a great summary. The discussion(offline and much of it on Slack) was whether to add new APIs for Java that removed *Option* from parameters of the existing Scala APIs and add builders where necessary or refactor Scala APIs to achieve this. My answer and response was based on that

Re: Feedback request for new Java API

2018-09-30 Thread Qing Lan
Here I have done a summary about the opinion most people holds: Naveen & Yizhi thoughts in a technical way: Agreement: -1 for total Java conversion (build all wrappers from Scala to Java) Yizhi: A hybrid solution may works the best (Build only necessary Java class for Java users

Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release

2018-09-30 Thread Steffen Rochel
Kellen - please send a list of PR to consider for patch release. Steffen On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:27 PM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline Steffen. I think this > will go a long way in helping the community plan their

Podling Report Reminder - October 2018

2018-09-30 Thread jmclean
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 October 2018, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will

Re: Feedback request for new Java API

2018-09-30 Thread Bob Paulin
+1 to this suggestion.  Voting should be seen as a last resort to resolve differences in the community.  Perhaps a small POC of both approaches (or maybe others as well) might help the community discuss options in a more concrete way.  Sometimes is very difficult to "see" the differences between

Re: [DISCUSS] Use modernized C++11 range loops uniformly throughout the project

2018-09-30 Thread Chris Olivier
unless you don’t think that’s reasonable... On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 7:59 AM Chris Olivier wrote: > If you get three +1’s from the top 6 contributors of C++ code (by volume), > I’ll switch to -0, since the ones committing the most C++ code will be the > most impacted and probably it should be

Re: [DISCUSS] Use modernized C++11 range loops uniformly throughout the project

2018-09-30 Thread Chris Olivier
If you get three +1’s from the top 6 contributors of C++ code (by volume), I’ll switch to -0, since the ones committing the most C++ code will be the most impacted and probably it should be their decision, imho. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:28 AM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>

Re: Feedback request for new Java API

2018-09-30 Thread Marco de Abreu
Maybe we can take a step back and rather look at how we would like our users and mxnet developers to use the API. Imagine like a mock or pseudo code where we write a few examples with the "perfect" Java API. After that, we think about the technical implementation details and how it can be done (I

Re: [DISCUSS] Use modernized C++11 range loops uniformly throughout the project

2018-09-30 Thread kellen sunderland
About 60 but they're all addressed In the ref PR. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 6:12 AM Chris Olivier wrote: > How many errors exist in the code base right now if it were to be enabled? > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 7:03 PM Naveen Swamy wrote: > > > Thanks Kellen & Anton, for your detailed explanation