+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:37 PM Anirudh Subramanian
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:15 PM Zach Kimberg
> wrote:
>
> > We had a discussion a while back about trying to improve the way we
> handle
> > issues by assigning them to users who are working on them. However, the
> > discuss
+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:15 PM Zach Kimberg
wrote:
> We had a discussion a while back about trying to improve the way we handle
> issues by assigning them to users who are working on them. However, the
> discussion ended because issues could only be assigned to those with write
> access (com
+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:18 PM Zach Kimberg
wrote:
> We had a discussion a while back about trying to improve the way we handle
> issues by assigning them to users who are working on them. However, the
> discussion ended because issues could only be assigned to those with write
> access (com
We had a discussion a while back about trying to improve the way we handle
issues by assigning them to users who are working on them. However, the
discussion ended because issues could only be assigned to those with write
access (committers).
I just came across a new Github feature where issues ca
so the original email suggesting to remove was after all self-serving :)
let's encourage if someone wants to maintain and make use of the original
work and make it better.
-1 to remove at this point
P.S: I suggest to do some due diligence before bringing topics up for
discussion.
On Wed, Sep 11
