Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Deferred compute in imperative interface to unify imperative and symbolic interface (#16376)

2019-10-05 Thread Sheng Zha
Thanks for the proposal, @leezu. Since this is a major change, I have some questions regarding the plan. First, should we restrict this mode to only apply to the new numpy arrays? Since the deferred compute mode won't support reverse shape inference, new blocks that implement the forward interf

Re: Revisit Maturity Model for MXNet

2019-10-05 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi Marco, On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 00:09, Marco de Abreu wrote: > Hi, > > These are very good points! I also noticed the security incident reporting > when I reviewed it and I agree that it's something we have to work out. > > I will work on something tomorrow and provide a draft for the community

Re: Revisit Maturity Model for MXNet

2019-10-05 Thread Marco de Abreu
Hi, These are very good points! I also noticed the security incident reporting when I reviewed it and I agree that it's something we have to work out. I will work on something tomorrow and provide a draft for the community to review. Do you think it's really necessary to have a separate email ali

Re: Revisit Maturity Model for MXNet

2019-10-05 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi, On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 01:46, Sheng Zha wrote: > Hi, > > It's time to revisit the Apache maturity model for MXNet and see where we > are with respect to graduation. Qing and I updated the maturity model in > the wiki [1]. Comments are welcome. > > for "QU30: The project provides a well-docume