Podling Mxnet Report Reminder - April 2020

2020-03-25 Thread jmclean
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 April 2020, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will form

Re: Podling Mxnet Report Reminder - April 2020

2020-03-25 Thread Sheng Zha
I'm working on a draft now and will report back with link once ready. -sz On 2020/03/20 03:18:09, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare

Re: CI Pipeline Change Proposal

2020-03-25 Thread Marco de Abreu
Back then I have created a system which exports all Jenkins results to cloud watch. It does not include individual test results but rather stages and jobs. The data for the sanity check should be available there. Something I'd also be curious about is the percentage of the failures in one run.

Re: CI Pipeline Change Proposal

2020-03-25 Thread Aaron Markham
+1 for sanity check - that's fast. -1 for unix-cpu - that's slow and can just hang. So my suggestion would be to see the data apart - what's the failure rate on the sanity check and the unix-cpu? Actually, can we get a table of all of the tests with this data?! If the sanity check fails... let's

Re: CI Pipeline Change Proposal

2020-03-25 Thread Marco de Abreu
We had this structure in the past and the community was bothered by CI taking more time, thus we moved to the current model with everything parallelized. We'd basically revert that then. Can you show by how much the duration will increase? Also, we have zero test parallelisation, speak we are