Anywhere is just fine. You will have to work harder for discoverability,
but the Foundation has never mandated on-our-hardware for community
interactions.
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Seb Kiureghian wrote:
> Thanks Greg! Just want to clarify, if the community intends to
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Seb Kiureghian wrote:
>...
> Discourse is open source so we can host it on Apache infrastructure and
> include it on our site.
To be clear: each community gets a single VM, and they are responsible for
running that VM (we provide a base
..@apache.org" <mattm...@apache.org>, "gene...@incubator.apache.org"
<gene...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Discussion Forums?
are you making it so that the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet (note
emphasis) to not be on Apache infrastructure?
Discourse
>
> are you making it so that the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet
> (note emphasis) to not be on Apache infrastructure?
Discourse is open source so we can host it on Apache infrastructure and
include it on our site. I will suggest PonyMail on the original thread and
see what the
Hi,
I can’t stress this enough – tooling is all fine and dandy, but are you making
it so that
the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet (note emphasis) to not be on
Apache
infrastructure?
There is no official policy other than if it didn’t happen on the list, it
didn’t happen.
What’s wrong with lists.apache.org as a forum?
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/15/17, 9:26 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote:
The MXNet community have been discussing the possibilities of a discussion
forum. I suspect I'm out of date on the topic. Has there been Incubator
The MXNet community have been discussing the possibilities of a discussion
forum. I suspect I'm out of date on the topic. Has there been Incubator
discussion on forums in the past few years? Are there projects running
forums? Discourse seems to be the current fashion.
My dated assumption is that