Thanks, Seb.
That is correct: I misunderstood the situation and thought that there
already was buy-in from within the pPMC, which is why this came across
as a foregone conclusion.
My apologies to all for inadvertently skewing the communications.
Kind regards,
Sally
- - -
Vice President
Clarifying as I think Isabel was too gentle :)
Before coming to Apache, there had been much talk of redoing the website,
perhaps via a dayjob contribution. I double checked at ApacheCon with Sally
that that was sane (corporate contribution of a website design).
The evolution of that conversation
I think this: >The pPMC would like to update the website.
is just to say that, the project's mentors reached out to the folks who
helped with the infra migration with a reminder about the website updates
that are needed.
I don't believe that a decision was made out of sight. Though I do fully
Hi,
First of all, great to read there are people with interest and time to update
the website.
Am 12. September 2017 19:00:21 MESZ schrieb Seb Kiureghian :
>The pPMC would like to update the website.
This wording is worrying to me. It sounds like a decision was made out of
Hello Apache MXNet dev@ community,
The pPMC would like to update the website. Amazon has offered to contribute
resources and I'm acting as a liaison to gather feedback from the
community. The new design is currently on the /master page:
https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/