Re: Please Help Fix MXNet Licensing Issues for the next Release!

Henri, Thanks for the detailed information, Based on your review and the comments on the general VOTE thread, I have made some changes to the top level LICENSE file in this PR . The final changes to the LICENSE file can be summarized as follows

Re: Please Help Fix MXNet Licensing Issues for the next Release!

The last paragraph of the LICENSE looks suspect. I doubt we've taken code from the BSD project. I would suggest deleting that last paragraph. With MIT and BSD licenses you do have to be careful that the text of each is the same. Each term is often used for a family of related licenses.

Re: Please Help Fix MXNet Licensing Issues for the next Release!

Marco, Thanks a lot for looking through this ! Some comments below - 1. *R-package:* Before we create the final tarball for the release, the R-package is explicitly removed from the cloned MXNet repo. The only info I have in this regard is that “there are some unresolved licensing issues

Re: Please Help Fix MXNet Licensing Issues for the next Release!

Hi Meghna, thank you for driving the licensing issues! - R-package: In the linked wiki, you're mentioning that R-package is not a part of the release. Could you please elaborate? From my understand, all files in the GitHub repository are part of the release. - Dockerfiles: I just checked another

Re: Please Help Fix MXNet Licensing Issues for the next Release!

Hello, This is an update on the current status of the license fixes (all details in the wiki linked below)– 1. I am constantly updating this wiki, so you can check it at any time to know the status - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses 2. All 7 PRs

Please Help Fix MXNet Licensing Issues for the next Release!

Hello All! I am currently attempting to fix the licensing issues in MXNet. These are being tracked in this wiki - *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses * You can follow the links in this