t; From: Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:04 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet
>
> define - not mature?
>
> Are all new commits that go into MXNet mature
ct: Re: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet
define - not mature?
Are all new commits that go into MXNet mature ?
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Xingjian SHI <xsh...@connect.ust.hk>
wrote:
> -1. We do not need to get the eyeballs this way. Asking users to
o: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet
The proposal is about bringing a forked version of Keras(that works only
with MXNet) into Apache MXNet repo submodule that way MXNet gets more
eyeballs from existing Keras users and eventually Gluon, etc.,
__________
> > > From: sandeep krishnamurthy <sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 1:49 PM
> > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet
t; > repo is still not mature enough.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Xingjian
> >
> >
> >
> > From: sandeep krishnamurthy <sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 1:49 PM
> > To: d
: sandeep krishnamurthy <sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 1:49 PM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet
>
> Hello MXNet Community,
>
> Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contrib
On 2018/03/23 05:49:07, sandeep krishnamurthy
wrote:
> Hello MXNet Community,
>
> Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contributors, I am working on adding
> MXNet backend for Keras. Currently supporting around ~70% of Keras APIs
> across CNNs and RNNs.
>
ubject: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet
Hello MXNet Community,
Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contributors, I am working on adding
MXNet backend for Keras. Currently supporting around ~70% of Keras APIs
across CNNs and RNNs.
https://github.com/deep-learning-tools/kera
-1
If you make MXNet a submodule of keras, then you should PR that to keras.
If you want something like mxnet.keras, then you should do a full rewrite that
only keeps the keras interface.
On 2018/03/23 05:49:07, sandeep krishnamurthy
wrote:
> Hello MXNet
+1
> On Mar 22, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Chris Olivier wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:49 PM sandeep krishnamurthy <
> sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello MXNet Community,
>>
>> Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contributors, I am working on
+1
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:49 PM sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello MXNet Community,
>
> Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contributors, I am working on adding
> MXNet backend for Keras. Currently supporting around ~70% of Keras APIs
> across CNNs and
Hello MXNet Community,
Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contributors, I am working on adding
MXNet backend for Keras. Currently supporting around ~70% of Keras APIs
across CNNs and RNNs.
https://github.com/deep-learning-tools/keras/tree/keras2_mxnet_backend
We wanted to gather the community
12 matches
Mail list logo