Re: dmlc packages into 3rdpary

Before the next release we need some kind of "this isn't Apache code" so the reviewers can treat it accordingly. Putting in third-party/ works for me. I suspect it will remain controversial; but at least the focus will be in the right way. Hen On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Chris Olivier

Re: dmlc packages into 3rdpary

Some existing release pipelines may rely on the folder structure for caching, so this needs to be coordinated. Best regards, -sz On 1/19/18, 11:51 AM, "Tianqi Chen" wrote: I think it is fine either way as it won’t affect the build status of the projects.

Re: dmlc packages into 3rdpary

I think it is fine either way as it won’t affect the build status of the projects. Tianqi On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:43 AM Chris Olivier wrote: > Is the general consensus to move the dmlc packages into 3rdparty? > > If so, I can submit a PR that does this. > > I have no