Re: Report of MXNet NumPy Project Status

Thanks, that's a nice summary. Great job and good to know the progress. I think we can do some exciting stuff in terms of parsing the Python AST and converting to a computational graph. Maybe we could brainstorm on that further on the linked ticket. On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:12 AM Jun Wu wrote:

Report of MXNet NumPy Project Status

Dear Community, A few months ago, we submitted this RFC proposing introducing NumPy-compatible coding experience into MXNet. As it has been some time since the proposal, we would like to share the progress with the community and listen to

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

I don't have necessary rights to reopen this PR. пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 08:00, Pedro Larroy : > Hi Anton, Stas. > > Can we reopen this PR and get it merged as per the data collected by Stas? > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12160 > > >

Re: Dependency Update

Thanks for doing a thorough look at the version ranges. I have this PR [1] waiting for review that tries to pin graphviz and opencv, and it updates CI as well as the docs that go on the website. I think your updates would be beneficial in the docs that go on the website and should also update CI.

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.5.0 Release Plan

Hi @dev, Thanks for working hard for the 1.5 release, since there has been several release blockers (mostly fixed). We are extending the code freeze to Friday 05/22/2019. Right now we are tracking the following 5 open PRs[1][2][3][4][5] and 1 issue[6]. Please let us know if you need more time. I

Re: Dependency Update

Thanks Aaron that's a great suggestion. The reason why I put it under tools/dependencies is that the doc is intended for developers who want to contribe to update the dependencies of our PyPI package. Regarding the CI, I'm also working on upgrading CUDA/cuDNN version that CI use -PR[1][2].

Re: Report of MXNet NumPy Project Status

 Nice progress Jun! On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:12 AM Jun Wu wrote: > Dear Community, > > A few months ago, we submitted this RFC > proposing > introducing NumPy-compatible coding experience into MXNet. As it has been > some time since

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

Thanks Aaron and Anton! Can we rebase to update the PR? Let me know how can I help further if you find some problems. On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Aaron Markham wrote: > > I reopened it for you. > > On Wed, May 22, 2019, 05:25 Anton Chernov wrote: > > > I don't have necessary rights to

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

Great! Thank you, Aaron. I have rebased it. ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 15:49, Aaron Markham : > I reopened it for you. > > On Wed, May 22, 2019, 05:25 Anton Chernov wrote: > > > I don't have necessary rights to reopen this PR. > > > > пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 08:00, Pedro Larroy : > > > > > Hi Anton,

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

We are now waiting for a committer's review and merge. ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 22:14, Pedro Larroy : > Thanks Aaron and Anton! Can we rebase to update the PR? Let me know > how can I help further if you find some problems. > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Aaron Markham > wrote: > > > > I

Re: warnings as errors

I was not able to fix the warnings on mshadow type switch with unused local typedefs, that's one example of warning that I would disable. I couldn't find a way to solve that one and I think the ramifications of an unused typedef are not likely to cause bugs in the code and are more of a pedantic

Dependency Update

Dear Community, I have been working on dependency udpate of MXNet. The goal is to upgrade the dependencies that have security vulnerability issues and make MXNet great again by being benefit from latest CUDA, cuDNN and NCCL software. I documented the process on PR<

Re: Dependency Update

Great work Jake! The content on CPU/GPU build instruction is really helpful. Thanks, Qing From: Jake Lee Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 17:26 To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Dependency Update Dear Community, I have been working on dependency udpate