RE: Slack Subscribe
Yep! Thank you -Original Message- From: Hen [mailto:bay...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 5:22 PM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Slack Subscribe Looks like someone has sent you an invite. (Folk, please let the list know when you've invited, otherwise N other people will burn time; apologies if whomever invited was doing it at exactly the same time). On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Tyler Kvochickwrote: > Hello, > > Trying to subscribe to the MXnet slack channel. > > thanks >
Re: Slack Subscribe
Looks like someone has sent you an invite. (Folk, please let the list know when you've invited, otherwise N other people will burn time; apologies if whomever invited was doing it at exactly the same time). On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Tyler Kvochickwrote: > Hello, > > Trying to subscribe to the MXnet slack channel. > > thanks >
Slack Subscribe
Hello, Trying to subscribe to the MXnet slack channel. thanks
Re: Draft of blog post for MXNet v0.12 release
Yes, I have been in touch with Sally for this post, and she is aware of this. It will not be published via official press release. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Chris Mattmannwrote: > Has this been in coordination with Sally? There’s a pretty hard and fast > Incubator rule to not promote > Podlings via official press channels – where will this be published? > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 10/30/17, 4:08 PM, "Suk Won Kim" wrote: > > Created a page in cwiki for a draft of blog post for MXNet v0.12 > release. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ > Draft+of+blog+post+for+MXNet+v0.12+release > > Thanks. > -- > > *Sukwon Kim, * > > > > -- *Sukwon Kim, * Senior Product Manager-Technical, Amazon Web Services (AWS) EC2
Draft of blog post for MXNet v0.12 release
Created a page in cwiki for a draft of blog post for MXNet v0.12 release. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Draft+of+blog+post+for+MXNet+v0.12+release Thanks. -- *Sukwon Kim, *
Re: MXNet blog for upcoming release
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15407 On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Henwrote: > Having a blog for the project sounds like a good idea. > > I don't see one already existing, and I see other incubator podlings with > a blog, so I'll go ahead and open a JIRA. > > Hen > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Suk Won Kim wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Meghna is going to execute the MXNet v0.12 release on 10/31. >> I'd like to help her with creating MXNet blog for it. >> Can you please point me to the instructions how to create a blog? >> Thanks! >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sukwon Kim, * >> > >
Re: MXNet blog for upcoming release
Having a blog for the project sounds like a good idea. I don't see one already existing, and I see other incubator podlings with a blog, so I'll go ahead and open a JIRA. Hen On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Suk Won Kimwrote: > Hi all, > Meghna is going to execute the MXNet v0.12 release on 10/31. > I'd like to help her with creating MXNet blog for it. > Can you please point me to the instructions how to create a blog? > Thanks! > > > -- > > *Sukwon Kim, * >
Re: Request for an invite to MXNet slack channel
Done On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:04 PM Suk Won Kimwrote: > Hello, > Please send me an invite to the MXNet Slack Channel ASAP. > Thanks! > > -- > > *Sukwon Kim, * >
Re: [Proposal] Stabilizing Apache MXNet CI build system
How about we ask for a new mxnet repo to store all the config in? On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:30 Pedro Larroywrote: > Just to provide a high level overview of the ideas and proposals > coming from different sources for the requirements for testing and > validation of builds: > > * Have terraform files for the testing infrastructure. Infrastructure > as code (IaC). Minus not emulated / nor cloud based, embedded > hardware. ("single command" replication of the testing infrastructure, > no manual steps). > > * CI software based on Jenkins, unless someone thinks there's a better > alternative. > > * Use autoscaling groups and improve staggered build + test steps to > achieve higher parallelism and shorter feedback times. > > * Switch to a branching model based on stable master + integration > branch. PRs are merged into dev/integration which runs extended > nightly tests, which are > then merged into master, preferably in an automated way after > successful extended testing. > Master is always tested, and always buildable. Release branches or > tags in master as usual for releases. > > * Build + test feedback time targeting less than 15 minutes. > (Currently a build in a 16x core takes 7m). This involves lot of > refactoring of tests, move expensive tests / big smoke tests to > nightlies on the integration branch, also tests on IoT devices / power > and performance regressions... > > * Add code coverage and other quality metrics. > > * Eliminate warnings and treat warnings as errors. We have spent time > tracking down "undefined behaviour" bugs that could have been caught > by compiler warnings. > > Is there something I'm missing or additional things that come to your > mind that you would wish to add? > > Pedro. >
Request for an invite to MXNet slack channel
Hello, Please send me an invite to the MXNet Slack Channel ASAP. Thanks! -- *Sukwon Kim, *