Re: [LAZY VOTE][RESULT] Upgrade CI to CUDA 9.1 with CuDNN 7.0

Is there a plan for adding those CUDA 8 tests back to CI? What about CUDA 7? There were a few build problems in the past few weeks due to lack of CI coverage: - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10710 were found during 1.2 rc voting -

Re: MKL with 1.2.0rc3

I understand that MKLML was experimental but like you pointed out it has been around for a while, so I am presuming some bugs would have been fixed. Users have also seen about 30% performance boost with MKL, now with the latest release we are dropping support and forcing to use another

MKL with 1.2.0rc3

How do I build the latest release(1.2.0rc3) with MKL enabled, it looks like its now defaulting to the experimental MKLDNN. I do not want to MKLDNN as it is experimental. -Naveen

installation page UX

Hi, I've written some notes on the wiki about issues with the installation page along with some suggestions. I'd appreciate your feedback here or on the wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Installation+page+UX Cheers, Aaron

Re: Auto scaling for MXNet CI

Thanks a lot! The following numbers are based on our experience in the test environment. Best case: ~1:50h (unchanged) (0:01 + 0:38 + 0:39 + 0:33 + 0:03) - conditions: No instances have to be provisioned and caches are primed Average case: 2:10h (1:50h + 0:10 for instance startup + 0:10 for cache

Abandoned MXNet readthedocs site

It seems we (Apache MXNet) have an old documentation site posted at: https://newdocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ and only the absent @Awyan has the permissions to the site. See https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10409 for more details. Raising this with readthedocs.org, we've

Re: MXNet 1.2 release question ?

Hi Hen, The project didn't publish any such guaranteed timeline for releases. What I meant with "late with release" was that this release had taken more time than any previous releases that I can recall. Anirudh On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Hen wrote: > I don’t