Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

This is great discussion. Thanks @lanking520 for initiating this. Perhaps we can define some key metrics here so we can compare the solutions later? -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: Kubeflow support for MXNet deployment

I just added an initial list of adopters of MXNet Operator here: https://github.com/kubeflow/mxnet-operator/pull/63 *Commnity - If your company uses MXNet Operator, please let me know in the PR*. On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:08 AM Yuan Tang wrote: > Definitely. Thanks for asking and I am ha

Re: Kubeflow support for MXNet deployment

; this feature versus other feature requests in MXNet when we get proposals > by new members to contribute. > > Best, > Sandeep > > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, 7:50 am Yuan Tang, wrote: > > > Hi community, > > > > We are currently looking into adding support fo

Kubeflow support for MXNet deployment

/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/4805. Cheers, Yuan -- Yuan Tang https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/ <https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/>

Re: Workflow proposal

d > > into master and it doesn't change the workflow, and staging is the branch > > where nightly changes are merged to. > > > > Have this been considered? > > > > Pedro. > > > -- Yuan Tang https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/ <http://twitter.com/TerryTangYuan> <https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/>

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

I propose option 1 and 2 since it took us a lot of efforts to bring MXNet to Scala originally and there are already adopters of Scala API in industries (some may not have been disclosed yet). But I am open to other options. Not familiar with DJL though but I assume @frankfliu and @lanking520

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)

+1 for "upgrade/rewrite Scala API and bring up MXNet 2.0 features" as it took us a lot of efforts to bring MXNet to Scala originally and there are already adopters of Scala API in industries. -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)

ps://docs.aws.amazon.com/dlami/latest/devguide/tutorial-onnx-pytorch-mxnet.html > > -- > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17676#issuecomment-595835658 --

List of Adopters of MPI Operator

Hi Apache MXNet community, We've just added an initial list of adopters of Kubeflow's MPI Operator here: https://github.com/kubeflow/mpi-operator/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md I know some of you might be using Horovod + Apache MXNet via MPI Operator (check out the examples here

Re: Stop redistributing source code of 3rdparty dependencies to avoid licensing issues

+1 On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:59 PM Chris Olivier wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:19 AM Lausen, Leonard > > wrote: > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > as per recent mail on gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] there are a > number > > of > > licensing issues in MXNet 1.6rc1. Based on

Re: MXNet 1.6 as last release with Python 2 support?

+1. It's interesting to see that you framed Python 2 and Python 3 as 2 languages. On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:43 PM Chaitanya Bapat wrote: > +1 > Taking the advantages into consideration, it makes sense to call off py2 > support from next release onwards. > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 9:37 AM

Re: new website

nes for docs is that > they're not wrapped by Sphinx, so our R contributors will have an > easier time testing and adding this kind of feature. > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:34 PM Yuan Tang wrote: > > > > Thanks for the update, Aaron. > > > > Regarding the R docs, one suggest

Re: new website

Thanks for the update, Aaron. Regarding the R docs, one suggestion I have is to use pkgdown package ( https://pkgdown.r-lib.org/index.html) to automatically generated the documentation pages (tutorials, API reference, etc.). I've seen huge adoption of this package being used for documentations in

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python < 3.6 Support Deprecation

ermined the following distribution: > > > > > > > 3.5: 11% > > > > > > > 3.6: 54% > > > > > > > 3.7: 30% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Deprecation for 3.5 is scheduled for 2020

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python 2 Support Deprecation

gt; question is what would be the mininum Python3 version supported? > Depending on that we might be able to use type annotations for example > or other features. > > Pedro. > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM Yuan Tang > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python 2 Support Deprecation

+1 On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:51 PM Yuxi Hu wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31 AM Tong He wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tong He > > > > > > Jake Lee 于2019年7月18日周四 上午11:29写道： > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Junru Shao > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: Python2 End of Life

+1 On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:37 PM Junru Shao wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 1:34 PM Aaron Markham > wrote: > > > +1 for the pledge and to start moving things to Python 3. > > I think our installation instructions and tutorials can be updated to > > default to Python3 and we should

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Zach Kimberg

Welcome! On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:36 PM Marco de Abreu wrote: > Welcome! > > Hagay Lupesko schrieb am Do., 9. Mai 2019, 19:33: > > > Congratulations Zach - well deserved! > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019, 13:26 Qing Lan wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Please join me in welcoming Zach Kimberg

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Wang Jiajun

Welcome! On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:09 PM Pedro Larroy wrote: > Welcome! > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:34 PM kellen sunderland > wrote: > > > > Welcome! Very impressed with the work fixing memory leaks so far. > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:14 AM Carin Meier > wrote: > > > > > Congrats! >

Re: Changes to MPI-operator

I am cc’ing MXNet dev mailing list here. Thanks for the note Roshani. Look forward to seeing your contribution! Though let’s also discuss this in MXNet dev mailing list since other people (e.g. Carl and Lin) might be working on this as well to avoid duplicate work. Best, Yuan On Mon, Apr 15,

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

+1 On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:29 PM Lin Yuan wrote: > +1. > > Just to give some of my real experience: > 1) I advertised a recent GluonNLP blog and many responses are "This seems > nice. So is Gluon a new library to replace MXNet?" > 2) We visited customers in a unicorn company who showed

Re: [Announcement] New Committer -- Steffen Rochel

Welcome! On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 1:46 PM Gavin M. Bell wrote: > Great news! > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:16 PM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > Welcome Steffen! > > > > Lin > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:53 PM kellen sunderland < > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Great news. Congrats

Re: [Announcement] New Committer -- Lin Yuan

Welcome Lin! On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 6:27 PM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Community: > > Please join me to welcome Lin Yuan(@apeforest) as a new committer of > Apache(incubating) MXNet! > > He has contributed to various improvements, including better compatibility > of larger arrays across the

Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Hi, It's great to see MXNet-Horovod integration got merged: https://github.com/uber/horovod/pull/542 Is there any future plan for this? I've been working on Kubeflow's MPI-Operator (https://github.com/kubeflow/mpi-operator) lately and it would be interesting to see an example of using Horovod +

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

+1 (binding) On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:05 PM Haibin Lin wrote: > Hi Carin, > > Thank you very much for driving this forward! > > +1 > > Best, > Haibin > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM Sebastian wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 05.11.18 11:29, Carin Meier wrote: > > > This is a procedural

Re: [VOTE] - Adopt "Become a Committer and PPMC Member" Document

+1 On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:28 PM Tianqi Chen wrote: > +1 > > Tianqi > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM Carin Meier wrote: > > > This vote is to adopt the document > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] - Revisions to Committer Criteria

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:12 PM Naveen Swamy wrote: > I added clarifying sections to explicitly call out committers/PMC > privileges. Please review. > > Pasting here for convenience > Committer Privileges > >- Committers have write access to the code repository. >- Committers have an

Re: Request for comments - Keras-MXNet as submodule in MXNet

-1 I don't think this has significant difference. The adoption from existing Keras users will only come once it's landed in Keras repo. I doubt that many people will use it unless it's more stable and backward compatibility is guaranteed. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Naveen Swamy

Re: [VOTE] Disconnect all non-C API's from mxnet versioning

+1 On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Marco de Abreu < marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Tianqi Chen schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018, > 17:33: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Chris Olivier > > wrote: > > > > > It has

Re: JIRA notifications on dev@

+1 please disable the notifications On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:09 PM Haibin Lin wrote: > +1 to disable automatic notifications to dev@. > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Marco de Abreu < > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com > > wrote: > > > Haha, we need to have a discussion

Re: Proposal for treating warnings as errors in Linux & Clang builds (-Werror)

+1 On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:02 PM Ziyue Huang wrote: > +1 since warnings might be potential errors. In my perspective, an > excellent project is better to have 0 warnings. > > Chris Olivier 于2018年1月16日 周二上午2:27写道： > > > If enabled, it should only

Re: Join the slack channel

Apologize. Please ignore my last email that I replied to dev email instead of individual. Rand - let’s chat offline. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:25 PM Yuan Tang <terrytangy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey there! Does Uptake uses MXNet nowadays? > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:05 PM Rand

Re: Join the slack channel

Hey there! Does Uptake uses MXNet nowadays? On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:05 PM Rand Xie wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to join the slack channel and contribute my knowledge to the > mxnet project. Please let me know how to get the invitation link. > > Best regards, > Yuyang

Re: Stop automated message from Apache Git Service

This is quite annoying. Could anyone please change this? On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:25 PM Dom Divakaruni wrote: > Can we please do this? > > @Lnx2 > > > > On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:53 PM, Daniel Pono Takamori > wrote: > > > > We just transferred the

Re: [Vote] New MXNet Logo

+1 On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Nan Zhu wrote: > +1 > > Get Outlook for iOS > > -- > *From:* Joseph Spisak > *Sent:* Saturday, March 4, 2017 9:07:54 PM > *To:* d...@mxnet.apache.org > *Subject:*