t; > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/2c3357443ec3d49a11e93c89f278264ce10c2f08
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
;>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hey Steffen, I'd like to be able to merge this PR for version
> > > >>> 1.4:
> > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13310 . It
> > > >> fixes
&g
; > >>>>> output
> > >>>>>>>> when using the TensorRT feature. (Thanks to Nathalie for
> > >>> helping me
> > >>>>>>> track
> > >>>>>>>> down the root cause of the issue). I'm currently blocked
gt;>> 1.4:
>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13310 . It
>> >> fixes
>> >>> a
>> >>>>>>>> regression in master which causes incorrect feature vectors to
>> >>
root cause of the issue). I'm currently blocked on a
> >>> CI
> >>>>> issue
> >>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>> haven't seen before, but hope to have it resolved by EOW.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> O
One call-out I would make is that we currently don't support
>>> Turing
>>>>>>>> architecture (sm_75). I've been slowly trying to add support,
>>> but I
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> think I'd have capacity to do this done by EOW
t; > > > > >> Call for contributions from the community: Right now we have
> 10
> > PR
> > > > > > >> awaiting
> > > > > > >> merge
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> >
gt; > > > >> merge
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-merge+
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >&g
; > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-merge+
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> we have 61 open PR awaiting review.
> > > >
t; > > >> >
> > > > >> I would appreciate if you all can help to review the open PR and
the
> > > > >> committers can drive the merge before code freeze for 1.4.0.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The contribut
> > >> >
> > > > >> I would appreciate if you all can help to review the open PR and the
> > > > >> committers can drive the merge before code freeze for 1.4.0.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The contributors on the Java API are maki
;
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-review
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> I would appreciate if you all can help to review the open
> > PR and
> > >
are making progress, but
> not all
> > > >> performance issues are resolved. With some luck it should be
> > possible to
> > > >> code freeze towards end of this week.
> > > >>
> > > >> Are there o
r 1.4.0.
> > > >>
> > > >> The contributors on the Java API are making progress, but
> not all
> > > >> performance issues are resolved. With some luck it should be
> > possible to
> > > >>
gt; in
> > >> 1.4.0? If so, please communicate as soon as possible.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Steffen
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:26 PM Zhao, Patric <
> patric
so, please communicate as soon as possible.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Steffen
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:26 PM Zhao, Patric <
> patric.z...@intel.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
gt; > > >> The contributors on the Java API are making progress, but not all
> > > >> performance issues are resolved. With some luck it should be
> possible to
> > > >> code freeze towards end of this week.
> > > >>
> > > >>
k the MKLDNN
> to
> > GA
> > > > now.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the
> > > review
> > > > and I think it can be merged in this week.
> > > >
> > > > Than
> now.
> > >
> > > BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the
> > review
> > > and I think it can be merged in this week.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --Patric
> > >
> > >
>
y EOW. Does anyone
> > feel
> > > > > > > strongly
> > > > > > > > we need this in the 1.4 release? From my perspective this will
> > > > > already
> > > > > > > be
> > > >
>> > Thanks, Steffen. I think there is NO open issue to block the MKLDNN
to
> >> GA
> >> > now.
> >> >
> >> > BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the
> >> review
> >> > an
; > > >
> > > > > > >> Thanks Patrick, lets target to get the PR's merged this week.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Call for contributions from the community: Right now we have
> 10 PR
> > > &g
; > > >
> > > > > > >> Thanks Patrick, lets target to get the PR's merged this week.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Call for contributions from the community: Right now we have
> 10 PR
> > > > > > >> awaiting
utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-merge+
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> we have 61 open PR awaiting review.
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-merge+
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> we have 61 open PR awaiting review.
&
2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-review
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> I would appreciate if you all can help to review the open PR and the
> > > > >> committers can drive the merge before code freeze for 1.4.0.
> > > > >>
> &
;>
> > > >> The contributors on the Java API are making progress, but not all
> > > >> performance issues are resolved. With some luck it should be
> possible to
> > > >> code freeze towards end of this week.
> > > >>
> > &
If so, please communicate as soon as possible.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Steffen
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:26 PM Zhao, Patric
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks, Steffen. I think there
NO open issue to block the MKLDNN to
> >> GA
> >> > now.
> >> >
> >> > BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the
> >> review
> >> > and I think it can be merged in this week.
> >> >
&g
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 2:57 AM
> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0 release
> >
> >
fenroc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 2:57 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0 release
>
> On Friday the contributors working on Java API discovered a potential
> performance problem with inference u
+1 to wait until Java API work is ready since it is a major feature of the
release, yet performance should be at least on par with Python.
Also, I consider the MKL-DNN feature to be another major feature of the
release, the performance boost on CPU is significant [1], as an example,
ResNet50-v1
On Friday the contributors working on Java API discovered a potential
performance problem with inference using Java API vs. Python. Investigation
is ongoing.
As the Java API is one of the main features for the upcoming release, I
suggest to post-pone the code freeze towards end of this week.
I'd like to remind everyone that 'code freeze' would mean cutting a v1.4.x
release branch and all following fixes would need to be backported.
Development on master can be continued as usual.
Best
Anton
ср, 14 нояб. 2018 г. в 6:04, Steffen Rochel :
> Dear MXNet community,
> the agreed plan was
Dear MXNet community,
the agreed plan was to establish code freeze for 1.4.0 release today. As
the 1.3.1 patch release is still ongoing I suggest to post-pone the code
freeze to Friday 16th November 2018.
Sergey Kolychev has agreed to act as co-release manager for all tasks which
require
35 matches
Mail list logo
