r.
> >
> > Best,
> > Xingjian
> >
> > From: Sheng Zha
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:49 AM
> > To: d...@mxnet.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python 3.6 Support Deprecation
> >
> > Good summary. At the start th
,
> Xingjian
>
> From: Sheng Zha
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:49 AM
> To: d...@mxnet.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python 3.6 Support Deprecation
>
> Good summary. At the start the discussion thread my ask is to announce the
> i
Python 3.6 Support Deprecation
Good summary. At the start the discussion thread my ask is to announce the
intention of py2 deprecation in the next release, and then actually deprecate
py2 in the next major release. Thus, the appropriate timing for dropping py2
support in CI should be the start
Good summary. At the start the discussion thread my ask is to announce the
intention of py2 deprecation in the next release, and then actually deprecate
py2 in the next major release. Thus, the appropriate timing for dropping py2
support in CI should be the start of the next major release. The
Pedro,
thanks for already starting these efforts, but it might be too early for
that. Right now, this is a discussion thread where we try to gather
different opinions in order to lay a good base for a future voting thread.
In there, we would define the detailed timeline, versions etc. Until the
I have sent a PR that removes Python2 from CI. But was closed. I thought
everyone was +1 on this one. This would remove quite a bit of load on CI:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15990
If it's not the right time to do this, what steps do we need to take?
Pedro.
On Mon, Aug 26,
Lieven Govaerts writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 17:01, Leonard Lausen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice." and there have been a
>> few +1 after Chaitanya's reply to Pedro. I would like to check if these
>> only refer to Chaitanya's mail about a
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 17:01, Leonard Lausen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice." and there have been a
> few +1 after Chaitanya's reply to Pedro. I would like to check if these
> only refer to Chaitanya's mail about a dedicated "improvement" effort or
> about
+1
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:22 PM Junru Shao wrote:
> +1 for 3.6+
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:54 AM Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for 3.6+
> >
> > Yuan Tang schrieb am Do., 22. Aug. 2019,
> 08:08:
> >
> > > +1 to target 3.6+
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Leonard Lausen
+1 for 3.6+
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:54 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> +1 for 3.6+
>
> Yuan Tang schrieb am Do., 22. Aug. 2019, 08:08:
>
> > +1 to target 3.6+
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Leonard Lausen
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable
+1 for 3.6+
Yuan Tang schrieb am Do., 22. Aug. 2019, 08:08:
> +1 to target 3.6+
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Leonard Lausen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice." and there have been a
> > few +1 after Chaitanya's reply to Pedro. I would like to check
+1 to target 3.6+
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Leonard Lausen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice." and there have been a
> few +1 after Chaitanya's reply to Pedro. I would like to check if these
> only refer to Chaitanya's mail about a dedicated "improvement"
12 matches
Mail list logo
