Created a PR to resolve this issue.
https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet/pull/6944
Please have a review if it is ok.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> it clearly says that's for mini javascripts, images or PDFs - not for
> source code.
>
> "Sometimes the situation of a file is s
it clearly says that's for mini javascripts, images or PDFs - not for
source code.
"Sometimes the situation of a file is such that the recommended Apache
source header is not appropriate. Examples would be within images, minified
JavaScript or PDFs. In those cases, the following shorter form may b
I am refering to
https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-form-of-the-source-header-available
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> I am not aware of a shorter version. Below is the standard header that
> needs to go into all the files.
>
> /*
> * Licensed to t
I am not aware of a shorter version. Below is the standard header that
needs to go into all the files.
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding
I did notice that there is a shorter version of the header. I think we
could use that ?
Tianqi
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:58 AM Suneel Marthi wrote:
> Yes its absolutely necessary that every file have a Apache license header -
> and every project that comes into Apache does that.
> No, its got to
Yes its absolutely necessary that every file have a Apache license header -
and every project that comes into Apache does that.
No, its got to be at file level and not folder.
Lookup RAT plugin - what all projects use to ensure that files have license
headers.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Nav
that is a lot of edits to the source files just to include the
license terms, this will also change the history of the files. Can we add a
license file at a folder level and do this next time we touch the file?
Also Is this absolutely necessary?
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrot
Thought I'd describe one of the first sets of changes we should make when
the code moves to an Apache git repo.
We should update the licensing.
1) We should update the NOTICE file, once on Apache's source control, to
say:
Apache MXNet
Copyright 2017 The Apache Software Foundation
This product i
