No worries! I think we’ll stick with this version for the time being since
we haven’t had issues with it. Building from source is a non-starter since
this is part of an automated docker build for us and we don’t want all the
build-dependencies.
Thanks for looking into this!
On August 31, 2018 at
Thank you for noticing!
We are working on automating the process, but currently it's a manual
effort to publish to PyPi. We are experiencing some problems with the
publishing, but the issue should get resolved soon.
Best
Anton
пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 23:29, Alfredo Luque :
> See here:
>
Hi Alfredo,
Looks like the recent increase in binary size is causing timeouts when
publishing. I'm looking into it. In the meantime, please build from the source
until it's resolved. Sorry for the inconvenience.
-sz
On 2018/08/31 21:29:05, Alfredo Luque wrote:
> See here:
>
See here:
https://pypi.org/project/mxnet-cu90mkl/#history
No builds show up since 8/22. From what I can tell, other variants (eg;
mxnet-mkl) are up to date.
On August 31, 2018 at 2:24:30 PM, Anton Chernov (mecher...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi Alfredo!
Could you provide more info on this? Where do
Hi Alfredo!
Could you provide more info on this? Where do you get the information?
Best
Anton
пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 22:49, Alfredo Luque :
> Just curious why the latest build is 2018-08-22 while the other variants
> are up to date.
>
> Thanks,
>
> —
> Alfredo Luque
> Software Engineer
>
Just curious why the latest build is 2018-08-22 while the other variants
are up to date.
Thanks,
—
Alfredo Luque
Software Engineer
Machine Learning Infrastructure
Airbnb
San Francisco, CA
