Hey Bill, John ---
The user-role tags in HtmlNewspaperTableTag are mostly
a result of my ignorance. That component was built using the
DataTable as a prototype, and I must have missed that part.
Do the user role tags make sense? I haven't used those in any
of my components so I'm not familiar with
TilesViewHandler delegates restoreView() and createView()
to the ViewHandler that TilesViewHandler
is wrapping. So in this case ShaleViewHandler.
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:01 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Ted,
Before proposing this release to the incubator committee, we
should have the project otherwise ready to exit.
sounds good. Since we notice a *growing* community I think
time is right to leave incubator. Btw. will MyFaces
be a TLP?
We've met the technical criteria and just need to
Hello Sylvain, and thanks very much for your reply.
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 19:07 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot wrote:
I think this is the same as the bug we had for several components
(using the uiComponent.getValue() instead of the
uiComponent.getSubmittedValue() ).
As for the x:inputDate, it
greetings
actually i'm writing a code where do i need to render an attribute
from a backing bean that throws a string with html tags
//backinbean
public class Bean {
...
private String page1 =tabletrtdhello/td/tr/table;
...
public String getPage1(){
return
On the h:outputText / tag there is an escape attribute. This
escapes the String to be literally viewable in a browser. Set
escape to false and it will render real HTML code.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:05:15 -0500, Sonia Garavito
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greetings
actually i'm writing a code
Sonia,
I am relatively new to faces but I will do my best to try and help.
Are you sure you gave us the right input/output? Because it looks
like you rendered ouput is exactly what I would expect. You told the
bean to generate the exact same HTML as what you got.
Also, I don't think its
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:12:55 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
sounds good. Since we notice a *growing* community I think time is
right to leave incubator. Btw. will MyFaces be a TLP?
We mentioned applying for TLP in the proposal. So, if that's what we still
want, then yes.
Unless, of course,
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Note that Shale also includes its own ViewHandler extension, so this
would be unlikely to work unless the MyFaces one delegates its
createView() and restoreView() calls to the Shale version.
In addition, the Tiles support is unlikely to work optimally until
Shale addes
