>
> Awesome. I'll apply the patch on Sunday.
That didn't go very well.
1.1.5 snapshot works, but not 1.1.4.1 with the patch. I think it's just
my environment, but it will probably be a couple of days before I commit
this.
>
> Stan Silvert
> JBoss, a division of RedHat
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi, Geronimo has another JEE5 Milestone (2) release coming at the end of January. Has there been any
recent progress on the JSR-252 implementation of MyFaces 1.2 such that we can include a functional
snapshot within the next couple of weeks. Please advise.
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Hi,
i use the component in a current application, and it works very well
on both browsers ie and
firefox. The usage scenario is a confirm-/cancel dialog.
Any issues you are concerned with?
cheers,
Gerald
On 1/7/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you tested the modal dialog
Hi!
I'm working on the 1.2 implementation and got confused with something.
At api under javax\faces\component, I don't see any UIInput and similar
stuff, they seem to be under core\api\src\main\java-templates as templates,
what's the thing here?
Regards,
Cagatay
Coast Guard
Either that, or the eden state is assigned at first call to savestate--
so the initial accessor of the view would basically have an empty view
state, since their would be treated as the benchmark for all others.
This would allow incorporation of programmatically added components (as
long as yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved MYFACES-1215.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Already fixed in 1.1.x of myface
It would be fine, just not included in the eden state-- Facelets would
provide the eden state, then at the time of savestate, it would be
compared to the passed component tree, only saving deltas.
Until we get out of hierarchical state saving logic, we're going to be
stuck with too much state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-90?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462852
]
John Boardman commented on TOMAHAWK-90:
---
This fix worked perfectly for me. I put it just after in all my
co
>From: "Martin Marinschek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Facelets supports a
>
> setPropertyActionListener
>
> as well - if Clay does, I can't say.
>
The current Clay JSF 1.2 support is limited to the things that are not 1.2
specific. As you know, the new SetPropertyActionListene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462813
]
Sebastian Rose commented on TOMAHAWK-464:
-
Great! All the stuff works perfectly now...
> Make Tomahawk wor
Have you tested the modal dialog recently on both browsers?
regards,
Martin
On 12/20/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I want to suggest the promotion of following dojo components:
a) The dojo modal dialog
b) The dojo fisheye component
both components seem to be stable enough to
Supporting maintenance releases for our customers is one of the goals
of IRIAN, so if you need a maintenance release for certain projects, I
encourage you to take a look at the support contracts available from
IRIAN.at.
regards,
Martin
On 12/21/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anee
I wonder how we can handle the case of adding components
programmatically with this approach.
@Jacob: Have you thought up a solution for this?
regards,
Martin
On 12/22/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, my "idea" was probably partially inspired by things I read over
the las
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462808
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-110:
--
Which switchType client, reloadPage or reloadTag?
I assume client.
First
Hi Craig,
Facelets supports a
setPropertyActionListener
as well - if Clay does, I can't say.
regards,
Martin
On 12/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just out of curiousity, where did they add "it"? I don't s
Or reimplementing them.
regards,
Martin
On 1/5/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In case of of not sending by end of jan;
I am +1 on doing a "undo" on these extensions.
JM2C
-M
On 1/5/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> your ICLA seems not to
16 matches
Mail list logo