RE: MyFaces - Trinidad - Partial Page Rendering [PPR]

To avoid this problem of naming container, you should use the addPartialTarget method of RequestContext Api in the listener of the component which is generating the partial request. Dushyant --- On Fri, 5/9/08, GTrivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: GTrivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

Hello, I just started with a partial lifecycle module for trinidad. The partial lifecyle is currently an own artifact. The artifact overrides the default lifecyle and supports partial processDecodes, processValidators, processUpdates and rendering if the request parameter partialTarget is

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

Bernd, So to get this straight, is this going to be an extra jar file that you add to the classpath and allows for partial lifecycle processing or is this a change to the Trinidad impl itself? If the latter, I think we need to be very careful about changing the unoptimized lifecycle until

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

Hello Scott, Scott O'Bryan schrieb: Bernd, So to get this straight, is this going to be an extra jar file that you add to the classpath and allows for partial lifecycle processing or is this a change to the Trinidad impl itself? It's an optional jar file. But for a working partial

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

Bernd Bohmann schrieb: Also, is there any real way we can take a look at the code before it's committed? Maybe move it to the sandbox first so people can take a more detailed look at it? I would prefer a commit and review policy. I think it should not part of the sandbox. The new

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-1217) in portals stylesheet generated in the producer even when skin matches and suppress is true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12628882#action_12628882 ] Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1217: - EITHER the stylesheet urls should be

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

I spoke a bit with Bernd about this on the phone. I'd love to see this happen. Bernd, can you just create an artifact that we can review this ? Or is it possible that you create an issue in JIRA and you attach the patch and lifecycle + factory ? -M On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Bernd Bohmann

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

Very cool. Thanks.. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Scott, Scott O'Bryan schrieb: Bernd, So to get this straight, is this going to be an extra jar file that you add to the classpath and allows for partial lifecycle

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, just created issue TRINIDAD-1220. Can I commit the module to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/trinidad-partial-lifecycle? that is fine, to me... (please don't add it to the default

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

ok Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, just created issue TRINIDAD-1220. Can I commit the module to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/trinidad-partial-lifecycle? that is fine, to me...

Re: Partial Lifecycle for Trinidad

I'll take a look at the trim changes Monday. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bernd Bohmann schrieb: Also, is there any real way we can take a look at the code before it's committed? Maybe move it to the sandbox first so people can